Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
Summary
A reflection on how the machine-oriented /llm.txt files offer a simpler, clearer web experience that humans may also appreciate, speculating whether the AI revolution could improve the human web as a side effect.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/05/26, 11:07 AM
Similar Articles
@elliotchen100: https://x.com/elliotchen100/status/2054008474082918614
The article analyzes Andrej Karpathy's perspective on using HTML as an output format for LLMs, exploring the evolution of human-computer interaction from a neuroscience viewpoint. The author argues that although the future may shift toward neural simulation, HTML will likely remain a best practice for human-AI collaboration in the near to medium term due to its engineering maintainability and low cost.
Ask HN: What are tools you have made for yourself since the advent of AI?
Ask HN thread where users share tools they built for themselves since the advent of AI, including a design browser, GitHub dashboard, runtime system, and more.
@Thom_Wolf: Shifting structures in a software world dominated by AI. Some first-order reflections (TL;DR at the end): Reducing soft…
AI reduces software supply chains, revives monoliths, weakens legacy code persistence, favors strongly typed languages, and restructures open-source economics, with implications for new programming languages tailored to LLMs.
Early AI chat interfaces remind me of command line thinking. I wonder when the GUI equivalent shows up.
A reflection on how early AI chat interfaces resemble command-line interaction patterns, and a speculation about when a GUI-like paradigm shift will emerge for AI interactions, where the AI can directly observe and act on the user's context.
@evanyou: https://x.com/evanyou/status/2060409444123729935
A developer shares an interesting use case for running LLMs in the browser to inspect internal workings, highlighting a meaningful scenario for client-side AI.