coding is basically solved for the boring 90% of tasks
Summary
A developer shares experience using cheap AI models (DeepSeek v4, Hunyuan Hy3 preview) to automate 90% of coding tasks, with Opus reserved for the harder 10%, highlighting cost and latency trade-offs.
Similar Articles
Coding is solved
The author observes that AI has increasingly made coding a solved problem.
Coding is solved? Software is not.
The article argues that while AI coding tools have made implementation faster, software development remains complex because it involves turning ambiguous intent into reliable systems, a process that coding alone cannot solve.
under 2% quality gap but 10x cost difference: tested 5 models on identical tool calling tasks[D]
A developer tested five AI models on tool calling tasks and found that cheaper models perform within 2% of expensive models like Opus, with Tencent's Hunyuan under $1.50 vs Opus's $15, leading to a daily cost reduction from $40 to $9 by routing simpler tasks to cheaper models.
Coding with Agents
Coding with Agents explores how AI agents can assist developers in writing code, automating tasks, and improving productivity.
@PrajwalTomar_: IT'S SO OVER for builders who are not paying attention. I just ran Claude Code at a fraction of the usual cost using De…
A developer shares a cost-effective workflow using Claude Code with DeepSeek V4 and Codex, splitting frontend, backend, and review tasks across three models.