Mac Heads: Is there any point to MLX in September 2026?
Summary
A user questions the relevance of MLX on Apple M5 chips after llama.cpp updates for Metal improve GGUF model prefill performance, making MLX potentially redundant for certain tasks.
Similar Articles
Apple M5 isn't making full use of its matmul cores yet
Apple M5 silicon supports INT8 activations for matrix multiplication, but inference backends like MLX and Llama.cpp currently use 16-bit; custom w8a8 kernels achieve up to 1.4x speedup on Gemma4 prefill tasks.
@jun_song: The new engine for MLX is in its final stages of development. Just ran GLM-5.2 on a single MacBook (116GB) hitting 41.8…
Jun Song announces the final development stage of a new MLX engine, achieving 41.8 tok/s on a MacBook with a 256k context window and only ~4% quality loss, representing a significant performance improvement.
@TheAhmadOsman: To be clear, CUDA is still more mature than MLX if you’re comparing GPUs to the new M5 Ultra Mac Studio However, the ec…
The discussion compares CUDA's maturity to MLX in the context of Apple's M5 Ultra Mac Studio, stressing the need for competition to optimize hardware for local AI, which could enable Apple to surpass NVIDIA.
@ivanfioravanti: Apple M5 Max + MLX = raw power! Look at this demo I'm playing with "FasterLivePortrait-MLX" I started with MPS but resu…
The author demonstrates that migrating a LivePortrait implementation from MPS to Apple's MLX framework on an M5 Max chip results in significantly better performance and speed.
I fitted the new δ-mem research for apple silicon using mlx and openclaw integration! My findings
The author implements the δ-mem research paper on Apple Silicon using MLX and OpenClaw, showing memory and attention improvements in local AI agent tests, though with mixed results compared to CUDA benchmarks.