How are you testing whether an AI agent gets economically worse after a release?
Summary
The article discusses the challenge of detecting economic regressions in AI agents after updates and introduces ARRM as a tool for comparing behavior across releases, while asking how production teams are handling this issue.
Similar Articles
The quiet regressions are the real cost of building agents on someone else's model
The article highlights the hidden costs of building AI agents on external models, specifically unannounced behavioral regressions after updates that can disrupt automated workflows, and suggests strategies like version pinning to mitigate risks.
How is everyone handling agent regression testing in CI without going crazy?
The author discusses challenges in automated regression testing for AI agent tool calling in CI/CD due to LLM non-determinism and seeks community insights on effective setups and frustrations.
How do you handle your AI agent's tools/models changing under you in prod?
A discussion asking how developers handle changes in tools, APIs, or model versions that their AI agents depend on in production, including detection, fixes, and costs.
How do you decide which AI agents are worth keeping in production?
The article explores methods for evaluating AI agents in production to decide whether to retain, improve, or shut them down, citing research on metrics like cost, reliability, human effort, and business outcomes.
How do you keep your AI agent’s stack up to date as better models/tools come out?
The author discusses the challenge of keeping AI agent stacks current with evolving models and tools, and seeks insights from production teams on benchmarking and update practices.