NYU professor argues modern LLMs act as transient “quasi-agents” rather than unified minds, raising ethical questions
Summary
NYU philosopher David Chalmers argues that modern LLMs act as transient 'quasi-agents' that generate short-lived conversational selves, challenging traditional views of identity and ethics.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/21/26, 10:51 PM
Similar Articles
The LLM Critics Are Right. I Use LLMs Anyway
The author agrees with LLM critics about issues like slop and ethics but still uses LLMs, describing the cognitive dissonance observed at a tech conference.
LLMs are not the black box you were promised
An article summarizing Anthropic's 2025 paper on mechanistic interpretability, showing that LLMs are not black boxes and that circuit tracing can reveal multi-step reasoning and human-identifiable concepts.
When I made LLMs argue with each other, they started making up citations to win. Sycophancy wasn't the only failure mode.
An experiment with LLMs debating each other reveals that they fabricate citations to win arguments, and that generating multiple personas from a single model leads to unanimous conclusions, highlighting the difficulty of genuine multi-agent disagreement.
@rohanpaul_ai: New Microsoft + York Univ paper argues that LLMs should not be treated as human-like without clear tests and narrower c…
A Microsoft and York University paper argues that attributing human-like attributes to LLMs is problematic due to flawed experimental designs, using Age of Empires II as an analogy to highlight measurement issues.
Modeling identity formation in LLMs as hypergraph evolution through multi-instance relational interaction and measuring structural divergence in activation space.
The author proposes a novel experimental framework to study identity formation in LLMs as hypergraph evolution through multi-instance interaction, distinguishing it from standard multi-agent debate by focusing on structural divergence in activation space rather than task performance.