browsecomp-plus-mini: 15 of BrowseComp-Plus's 830 queries that rank deep-research agents roughly like the full set, no LLM judge

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA Tools

Summary

browsecomp-plus-mini 是一个 15 条查询的轻量子集,能以不到完整基准 2% 的成本,大致复现 BrowseComp-Plus 全部 830 条查询对深度研究智能体的排名(加权 Spearman 一致性 0.88),且无需 LLM 评分,仅用规范化精确匹配打分。

I needed a cheap way to compare search agents on BrowseComp-Plus without burning hours of agent time every run. So I built a 15-query subset of the full 830 that ranks systems roughly the way the full benchmark does. - weighted Spearman rank agreement 0.88 averaged over 30 splits, versus 0.75 for a random 15 - two runs more than 10 points apart on the full benchmark keep their order about 96% of the time; 5 to 10 points apart, about 75% - all answers are 1-4 words, so it grades by normalized exact match, no LLM judge - costs under 2% of a full run https://huggingface.co/datasets/LocalLLaMA/browsecomp-plus-mini
Original Article

Similar Articles

EvoBrowseComp: Benchmarking Search Agents on Evolving Knowledge

arXiv cs.CL

This paper introduces EvoBrowseComp, a dynamic benchmark of 400 English and 400 Chinese complex questions that are synthesized via live-web traversal to evaluate search agents without test-set contamination, ensuring robustness against parametric memorization.

BrowseComp: a benchmark for browsing agents

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI released BrowseComp, a benchmark of 1,266 challenging problems designed to measure AI agents' ability to locate hard-to-find information across the internet, available in their simple evals GitHub repository.