@Phoenixyin13: Nature journal confirms: How do ordinary people actually get rich? Harvard, Stanford, and Meta teamed up and directly extracted 72.2 million people and 21 billion real friend relationship chains from Facebook. Personally, I feel that this amount of data basically turned over most of the United States. They wanted to study an ultimate question: to...
Summary
Harvard, Stanford, and Meta jointly retrieved data on 72.2 million people and 21 billion friend relationships from Facebook to study the key factors affecting class mobility. They found that Economic Connectedness (EC), i.e., the size of cross-class social circles, is the most important indicator determining upward income mobility, with a correlation coefficient as high as 0.65.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/01/26, 12:07 PM
Nature Journal Stamp: How Do Ordinary People Actually Become Rich?
Harvard, Stanford, and Meta teamed up to directly pull 210 billion real friendship links from 72.2 million people on Facebook. I personally feel this dataset basically turned over nearly half of the United States.
They wanted to study an ultimate question: What really determines whether a person can break class stratification and climb up to wealth?
The result? All those flashy factors — school quality, community cohesion, religious beliefs, and so on — none were decisive. The hardest indicator is only one: Economic Connectedness, or EC for short.
In plain terms, it’s the size of your cross-class social circle.
Put more concretely: among low-income people, what proportion of their friends are wealthy.
The study found that this indicator has a correlation coefficient of 0.65 with intergenerational upward income mobility. In the social sciences, that’s a near-dominant super-high correlation.
We can derive a golden rule: if an ordinary kid from a humble background grows up in a community with a high proportion of wealthy people and where everyone gets along well, their average income as an adult can directly jump by 20%.
Since the password to making money is EC, the best thing an ordinary person can do to rise is break out of their social comfort zone, change environments to hang around circles — go to neighborhoods, schools, even gyms frequented by the wealthy or elite, such as high-intensity professional training grounds, high-quality academic salons.
More importantly, enhance your own link value. After all, the rich aren’t stupid; simple flattery won’t work. Use your professional skills, unique insights — even being proficient in AI/tech, or reaching the top in a small niche — as an entry ticket to provide emotional value and tool value to high-net-worth individuals.
Want to become rich? First look at who the five most powerful people in your social circle are. Proactively connect with those who are wealthier and have higher cognition than you. Start now.
This is a paper from five years ago, but I still remember it vividly.
Similar Articles
@gkxspace: Chinese people are damn amazing — one website vs. all social platforms fulfills all my data fantasies. Indeed, where there is demand, there is a market.
余温 shares a review of his three-year AI startup journey, arguing that technology is not valuable; channel and reach capabilities are what truly matter. He also recommends a website that aggregates data from all social platforms.
@FinanceYF5: 1/ You think you're using AI, but you're actually being filtered out by AI. Among Claude users in the U.S., 79.8% come from families with annual incomes above $100,000. This isn't a story about the rich—it's the silent dividing line falling in the spring of 2026.
According to reports, 79.8% of Claude users in the U.S. come from households earning over $100,000 a year, highlighting how AI technology is widening the socioeconomic gap, creating a silent dividing line.
@FinanceYF5: What you scroll through on X every day — the algorithm behind it has now been released on GitHub by Musk. This For You system simultaneously grabs content from people you follow and candidate posts from across the network, then uses a Grok-based transformer to predict the posts you're most likely to interact with. The black box of the information feed is being pried open…
Musk has open-sourced X's (formerly Twitter) For You recommendation algorithm on GitHub. The algorithm uses a Grok-based transformer to predict user interaction preferences.
@oragnes: That's truly heartbreaking! Silicon Valley venture capital godfather Marc Andreessen hits the nail on the head, tearing off the blindfold of social power: Why do genius experts with sky-high IQs end up working for "mediocre" generalists? He drops a brutal "0.4 law": In social science, the correlation between IQ and success (wealth, social status) is only...
The post cites Silicon Valley VC godfather Marc Andreessen's view, pointing out that the correlation between IQ and success is only 0.4, and that generalists (who integrate resources and understand human nature) are often more likely to gain social power and wealth than high-IQ specialists.
@FinanceYF5: 1/ About 10,000 people changed the mood of a city. Employees and founders of Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI, and Nvidia have amassed over $20 million in wealth in the past 5 years. Everyone outside that circle: even with a lifetime of high-paying jobs (under $500K annual salary), you'll never reach that number.
About 10,000 people—employees and founders from Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI, and Nvidia—accumulated over $20 million in wealth over the past 5 years, a number unattainable for those outside that circle even with high salaries.