@mattshumer_: With a few prompt tweaks/strategies, and a switch to Codex 5.5 instead of Opus 4.7, you can get MUCH closer to the SUPE…

X AI KOLs Following Models
codex-5-5 opus-4-7 superhot coding-agents prompt-engineering game-recreation

Summary

Switching from Opus 4.7 to Codex 5.5 with optimized prompts yields much better one-shot results for recreating the SUPERHOT game style using AI coding agents.

With a few prompt tweaks/strategies, and a switch to Codex 5.5 instead of Opus 4.7, you can get MUCH closer to the SUPERHOT design style. This was a one-shot output! https://t.co/fIEP3eWi6i
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/19/26, 06:47 AM

With a few prompt tweaks/strategies, and a switch to Codex 5.5 instead of Opus 4.7, you can get MUCH closer to the SUPERHOT design style.

This was a one-shot output! https://t.co/fIEP3eWi6i

Ronak Malde (@rronak_): Ever since we launched windsurf, one of my internal evals for coding agents has been recreating the game SUPERHOT, a puzzle/action game where time only moves when you move.

It’s the perfect test of tricky game mechanics, simple but beautiful art style, and balancing level

Similar Articles

I let Codex and Claude Opus work on the same Java AI agent monolith

Reddit r/AI_Agents

A developer compares Codex 5.3 and Claude Opus 4.6 on autonomous Java AI agent development, finding that the model with more elegant architecture (Claude) often produced code that never executed, while the more boring and direct Codex improved the working product with practical fixes like timeouts and history recovery.

One Shot Wolfenstein 3D - Opus 4.6 vs. Opus 5.5

Reddit r/singularity

This article compares the game generation capabilities of AI models Opus 4.6 and Opus 5.5 by having them create a complete Wolfenstein 3D-style game in a single HTML file, highlighting advancements in AI code generation over recent months.