What is human judgment doing in AI’s “last mile” that models still can’t?
Summary
The author reflects on whether human involvement in AI's 'last mile' has shifted since the 2019 book 'Ghost Work', exploring current unique roles of human judgment and its potential evolution.
Similar Articles
We are building more intelligent AI agents. But are humans building better ways to decide when they should act?
The article reflects on the evolving relationship between humans and AI, arguing that as AI becomes more autonomous, the key challenge is understanding human decision-making and purpose, rather than just technical capability. It suggests shifting from using AI as a mere tool to collaborating with it as an instrument that enhances human judgment.
Intelligence Age: Judgment
An essay exploring how AI collapses the distance between intuition and expression, and how this affects the development of human judgment and critical thinking.
On-Demand Human Judgement for AI Agents
Describes building an MCP server that provides on-demand human judgment for AI agents, allowing them to get real human responses for subjective decisions and evaluations instead of relying on synthetic or slow methods.
If AI can do the work, what exactly are we being paid for?
The article explores how AI's advancing execution capabilities may shift human roles towards goal-setting and judgment, while highlighting concerns about skill development and expertise building in a changing work landscape.
@addyosmani: https://x.com/addyosmani/status/2084354578196443351
Addy Osmani reflects on the role of taste and judgment in an AI-driven world, arguing that while AI can acquire taste, human judgment—rooted in accountability and ownership—remains irreplaceable.