@no_stp_on_snek: very cool. GLM seems to be like, nah we good.
Summary
A tweet showcases a visualization of 8 LLMs' reasoning traces on a probability question, highlighting moments of self-correction and pivoting.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/06/26, 04:08 PM
very cool. GLM seems to be like, nah we good.
stevibe (@stevibe): You know that “But, wait…” moment in every LLM thinking trace?
I made it visible.
I asked 8 models the same tricky probability question and rendered their reasoning as trees. Every time a model rejects its own idea and pivots, every “But…”, every “Wait, actually…”, a new
Similar Articles
@stevibe: You know that "But, wait..." moment in every LLM thinking trace? I made it visible. I asked 8 models the same tricky pr…
A visualization that shows how 8 different LLMs reason through a tricky probability question, with branches representing moments of self-correction like 'But, wait...'.
@lateinteraction: very cool work !!
Guowei Xu discusses limitations of Best-of-N and tree search methods for LLMs on hard reasoning problems, noting sparse verification signals and that candidates remain within the model's distribution.
LLMs know when they are wrong. I made a fix relating to Anthropic's new "global workspace" paper [R]
The author presents a method to make LLMs verbalize calibrated confidence by using a linear probe on mid-layer states and a small trained bridge to confidence logits, requiring only 200 labeled examples and no weight modification. This is linked to Anthropic's global workspace paper explaining the know-say gap.
@techNmak: I finally found someone who explained why LLM inference is fundamentally different from regular inference… without over…
A tweet shares a link to a clear, accessible explanation of why LLM inference differs from traditional inference, presented in a casual walking video.
@rohanpaul_ai: LLMs frequently underestimate how much information they need, so test when they stop instead of relying on answer accur…
A tweet summarizing an arxiv paper that evaluates how LLMs handle multi-turn information seeking, highlighting that LLMs often underestimate their information needs and may rely on prior knowledge rather than gathering sufficient evidence.