@Propriocetive: I turned down a $4M offer at a $40M valuation several months ago. Came back 4 months later with clear proof of progress…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

A founder shares his experience turning down two acquisition offers (at $40M and $400M valuations) for an AI interpretability startup using a geometric and proprioceptive approach, now with a finished product and open research on Zenodo.

I turned down a $4M offer at a $40M valuation several months ago. Came back 4 months later with clear proof of progress — scaled across all major clusters (except B300), significantly beaten competitors in interpretability at their own game. They came back with $40M at a $400M valuation. I turned it down again. We now have a finished product with: • Thousands of unfakeable benchmarks hosted on AWS S3 • Hundreds of GPU hours run on Lambda • Incorporated our superior fiber bundle IP into 6 other companies’ core problems — and outperformed them across the board The geometric + proprioceptive approach is delivering real, measurable advantages. Full patent novelty & value analysis here: https://chatgpt.com/share/6a48341d-d970-83ea-bd2c-f4f26fa52bcf… Additional discussion: https://share.google/aimode/AY878X9 ScloSprCMD @elonmusk @karpathy @sama @GoodfireAI @SakanaAILabs @rohanpaul_ai @xai https://zenodo.org/records/20808218… I’m being chased by the few VCs I have researched out to. My goal was always to wrap things up before I made a deal with anyone. I’m in the process of converting from provisional to utility this month and hiring a go to market guy. I have priority over the next AI architecture. I’ve published 1,500 pages of open research on Zenodo. Anything I don’t patent becomes prior art and the labs die. What would you do in this position?
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/05/26, 08:37 PM

I turned down a $4M offer at a $40M valuation several months ago. Came back 4 months later with clear proof of progress — scaled across all major clusters (except B300), significantly beaten competitors in interpretability at their own game. They came back with $40M at a $400M valuation. I turned it down again. We now have a finished product with: • Thousands of unfakeable benchmarks hosted on AWS S3 • Hundreds of GPU hours run on Lambda • Incorporated our superior fiber bundle IP into 6 other companies’ core problems — and outperformed them across the board The geometric + proprioceptive approach is delivering real, measurable advantages. Full patent novelty & value analysis here: https://chatgpt.com/share/6a48341d-d970-83ea-bd2c-f4f26fa52bcf… Additional discussion: https://share.google/aimode/AY878X9 ScloSprCMD @elonmusk @karpathy @sama @GoodfireAI @SakanaAILabs @rohanpaul_ai @xai

https://zenodo.org/records/20808218…

I’m being chased by the few VCs I have researched out to. My goal was always to wrap things up before I made a deal with anyone. I’m in the process of converting from provisional to utility this month and hiring a go to market guy.

I have priority over the next AI architecture. I’ve published 1,500 pages of open research on Zenodo. Anything I don’t patent becomes prior art and the labs die.

What would you do in this position?


Check out this chat

Source: https://chatgpt.com/share/6a48341d-d970-83ea-bd2c-f4f26fa52bcf Get responses tailored to you

Log in to get answers based on saved chats, plus create images and upload files.

Similar Articles

OpenAI Offered Him $2M To Stay Quiet

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

A former OpenAI insider, Daniel Kokotlo, warns about the risks of AI recursive self-improvement and proposes a safer global plan after leaving OpenAI and forfeiting $2 million in stock options.