@FinanceYF5: Many well-known VCs started with small funds of less than $10 million, filling the early financing gaps that larger institutions overlook. According to Dan Gray's data: For a $10 million fund, administrative and compliance costs in the UK are about $1.4 million, while in the US it's only $450,000. 2024 median fund size: US $20 million, ...

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

This article discusses the phenomenon of well-known VCs starting with micro funds, comparing the administrative and compliance cost differences between the UK and the US for $10 million funds, and points out that high fixed costs make it harder for small funds to survive.

Many well-known VCs started with small funds of less than $10 million, filling the early financing gaps that larger institutions overlook. According to Dan Gray's data: For a $10 million fund, administrative and compliance costs in the UK are about $1.4 million, while in the US it's only $450,000. 2024 median fund size: US $20 million, UK $88 million. High fixed costs make it harder for small funds to survive. https://t.co/geFSuGY6ut
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/28/26, 11:38 AM

Many renowned VCs start with small funds of less than $10 million, filling the early-stage funding gap that larger institutions often overlook.

Data from Dan Gray: For a $10 million fund, administrative and compliance costs in the UK are about $1.4 million, while in the US they are only $450,000.

Median fund size in 2024: $20 million in the US, $88 million in the UK. High fixed costs make it harder for small funds to survive. https://t.co/geFSuGY6ut

Similar Articles

@FinanceYF5: 5% of VCs create 90% of venture capital profits. Stanford GSB professor Ilya Strebulaev built a ranking based on 30 years and 230,000 investments, correcting for inflated valuations, round-by-round dilution, net income, and time decay, and does not use self-reported data from institutions. Its correlation with the Midas List is only 0.2...

X AI KOLs Following

Stanford GSB professor Ilya Strebulaev releases a venture capital ranking based on 30 years and 230,000 investments, showing that 5% of VCs create 90% of profits, and it has a low correlation with the Midas List.

@FinanceYF5: 1/ Keeping one foot in your home country and one foot in Silicon Valley is becoming a unique advantage for entrepreneurs. Over half of the billion-dollar companies in the US were founded or co-founded by immigrants; in early investments by a16z Apps, 44% have international founders. Why is a multinational background becoming a moat?

X AI KOLs Timeline

Over half of the billion-dollar companies in the US were founded or co-founded by immigrants; in early investments by a16z Apps, 44% have international founders. A multinational background is becoming a unique advantage and moat for entrepreneurs.

@FinanceYF5: The VC ranking behind US unicorns has been updated: Sequoia and Andreessen Horowitz are very close. This list only counts investments made before companies become unicorns, better showing which institutions truly discovered and bet on potential companies early on.

X AI KOLs Timeline

Updated US unicorn venture capital rankings show Sequoia and Andreessen Horowitz are very close. This list only counts investments before companies become unicorns, highlighting the ability of institutions to discover potential early.