@ds3638: Evals are dead. Or more precisely: traditional eval-driven development doesn’t scale. Static evals were useful when age…
Summary
Traditional eval-driven development doesn't scale for long-running autonomous agents; observability-driven development—with tight guardrails, production trajectory collection, and behavior clustering—is becoming the foundation for prod-ready AI systems.
Similar Articles
Why eval startups fail (2025)
This article explores why independent AI evaluation startups rarely succeed, citing talent drain to more lucrative parts of the stack, a narrow customer base, and optimization pressures that degrade eval utility.
@levie: Almost all AI model and agent progress is downstream from evals. Open weights post training for specific domains comes …
Almost all AI model and agent progress depends on evaluations (evals). Understanding workflows and agent performance through evals will become a core enterprise competency for driving automation.
@OpenAI: Let’s talk about evals. We’re always looking for better ways to measure and forecast model progress, especially as benc…
OpenAI discusses the importance of evals (evaluations) for measuring and forecasting model progress, especially as benchmarks become saturated or gamed, featuring insights from Tejal Patwardhan and Andrew Mayne.
Why agents that pass every eval still drift once they hit real production traffic
AI agents often drift in production after passing evals due to distribution shifts and upstream changes; continuous evaluation and real-time monitoring can mitigate this.
@djfarrelly: https://x.com/djfarrelly/status/2052779234234380479
The article argues that AI agent development should rely on stable execution primitives rather than rigid frameworks, which frequently change with emerging orchestration patterns. It emphasizes durable steps, persistent state, parallel coordination, event-driven flow, and observability to prevent costly rewrites as best practices evolve.