@Miles_Brundage: I'm all for the government taking cyber risks seriously. But we need a real, unclassified framework for this stuff and …

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

Miles Brundage argues for a real, unclassified framework for government cyber risk management, criticizing the current laissez-faire approach.

I'm all for the government taking cyber risks seriously. But we need a real, unclassified framework for this stuff and need to stop pretending we're in laissez-faire world, which increases the risk of abuse, creates market uncertainty, and leads to lower quality decisions
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/25/26, 09:27 PM

I’m all for the government taking cyber risks seriously.

But we need a real, unclassified framework for this stuff and need to stop pretending we’re in laissez-faire world, which increases the risk of abuse, creates market uncertainty, and leads to lower quality decisions

Similar Articles

The Cyber Risk Discourse is Broken (11 minute read)

TLDR AI

Nathan Lambert argues the cyber-risk debate around open-weight models is broken: policy is being driven by fear-based classified briefings and Anthropic's GLM-5.3 report while ignoring that closed models cause most documented cyber attacks and that banning open models carries trade-offs for US competitiveness and long-term security.