Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models for Electricity Price Forecasting: Contamination Risk, Distributional Shifts, and Covariate Dependence
Summary
This paper evaluates time series foundation models for electricity price forecasting, examining contamination risk, distributional shifts, and covariate dependence. It finds TSFMs are competitive but depend on covariate support, and ensembles with domain-specific methods show promise.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/07/26, 04:38 AM
# Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models for Electricity Price Forecasting: Contamination Risk, Distributional Shifts, and Covariate Dependence Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02623](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02623) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.02623) > Abstract:Time series foundation models \(TSFMs\) have shown strong zero\-shot forecasting performance, but their generalization in covariate\-driven, non\-stationary settings is underexplored\. Electricity price forecasting \(EPF\) presents a challenging testbed due to complex temporal dependencies, distributional shifts, and strong reliance on structural and contextual information\. We propose a two\-dataset\-benchmarking framework for EPF to mitigate contamination risk and enable fair evaluation of TSFMs\. We examine key aspects of EPF including point and probabilistic forecasting performance, tail behavior, price spikes, and comparisons against domain\-specific methods\. We find that TSFMs are highly competitive and often outperform general\-purpose baselines\. Yet, their performance depends critically on covariate support, and they do not consistently surpass domain\-specific methods tailored to EPF\. Interestingly, simple ensembles of TSFMs and domain\-specific methods appear to have significant potential, suggesting that the two approaches capture complementary predictive information\. ## Submission history From: Ahmed Aziz Ezzat \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/05fa122c/2607.02623)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 2 Jul 2026 11:43:22 UTC \(2,185 KB\)
Similar Articles
Foundation models for electricity price forecasting and battery arbitrage: Can they replace market-specific forecasting models?
The paper compares foundation models with market-specific benchmarks for electricity price forecasting, finding that only TabPFN consistently outperforms statistically, but economic value varies by strategy and risk tolerance, suggesting foundation models cannot universally replace tailored models.
TS-Fault: Benchmarking Time Series Forecasters Against Structural Faults
This paper introduces TS-Fault, a benchmark for evaluating time series forecasting models under structured fault scenarios like broken dependencies and regime changes, finding that clean-data accuracy often anti-correlates with robustness and that foundation models are especially fragile.
Assessing the Operational Viability of Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting
This paper presents an applied evaluation of foundation models for time series forecasting compared to supervised approaches across four operational domains, and proposes a Complexity Router to selectively assign series to the optimal model class for balancing accuracy and inference cost.
Machine Learning and Time-Series Foundation Models for Day-Ahead Electricity Forecasting in a University Building
该论文在一所大学建筑上对比了统计模型、XGBoost、LSTM与预训练时间序列基础模型TimesFM用于日前电力预测的效果，发现TimesFM 3.0配合协变量将平均绝对误差相对季节性朴素基线降低约43%，而XGBoost仍具竞争力。
TSFMAudit: Data Contamination Auditing in Forecasting Time Series Foundation Models
This paper introduces TSFMAudit, the first method for auditing pretraining data contamination in time series foundation models, using probe adaptation dynamics to detect unusually efficient fine-tuning that indicates prior exposure.