Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models for Electricity Price Forecasting: Contamination Risk, Distributional Shifts, and Covariate Dependence
Summary
This paper evaluates time series foundation models for electricity price forecasting, examining contamination risk, distributional shifts, and covariate dependence. It finds TSFMs are competitive but depend on covariate support, and ensembles with domain-specific methods show promise.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/07/26, 04:38 AM
# Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models for Electricity Price Forecasting: Contamination Risk, Distributional Shifts, and Covariate Dependence Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02623](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02623) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.02623) > Abstract:Time series foundation models \(TSFMs\) have shown strong zero\-shot forecasting performance, but their generalization in covariate\-driven, non\-stationary settings is underexplored\. Electricity price forecasting \(EPF\) presents a challenging testbed due to complex temporal dependencies, distributional shifts, and strong reliance on structural and contextual information\. We propose a two\-dataset\-benchmarking framework for EPF to mitigate contamination risk and enable fair evaluation of TSFMs\. We examine key aspects of EPF including point and probabilistic forecasting performance, tail behavior, price spikes, and comparisons against domain\-specific methods\. We find that TSFMs are highly competitive and often outperform general\-purpose baselines\. Yet, their performance depends critically on covariate support, and they do not consistently surpass domain\-specific methods tailored to EPF\. Interestingly, simple ensembles of TSFMs and domain\-specific methods appear to have significant potential, suggesting that the two approaches capture complementary predictive information\. ## Submission history From: Ahmed Aziz Ezzat \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/05fa122c/2607.02623)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 2 Jul 2026 11:43:22 UTC \(2,185 KB\)
Similar Articles
TS-Fault: Benchmarking Time Series Forecasters Against Structural Faults
This paper introduces TS-Fault, a benchmark for evaluating time series forecasting models under structured fault scenarios like broken dependencies and regime changes, finding that clean-data accuracy often anti-correlates with robustness and that foundation models are especially fragile.
Assessing the Operational Viability of Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting
This paper presents an applied evaluation of foundation models for time series forecasting compared to supervised approaches across four operational domains, and proposes a Complexity Router to selectively assign series to the optimal model class for balancing accuracy and inference cost.
TSFMAudit: Data Contamination Auditing in Forecasting Time Series Foundation Models
This paper introduces TSFMAudit, the first method for auditing pretraining data contamination in time series foundation models, using probe adaptation dynamics to detect unusually efficient fine-tuning that indicates prior exposure.
Evaluating the Generalizability of Foundation Models for Extreme Environmental Events: Case Study of California Wildfire PM2.5
This paper systematically evaluates time series foundation models (TSFMs) for forecasting extreme PM2.5 concentrations from wildfire smoke using a 12-year dataset from California. Results show that fully-trained recurrent baselines like BiLSTM outperform TSFMs, challenging the assumption that larger pretrained models dominate in environmental forecasting.
Do Time Series Foundation Model Benchmarks Hide Regime-Dependent Failures? Evidence from Traffic Speed Forecasting
This paper introduces regime-stratified evaluation for time series foundation models, revealing that aggregate metrics hide severe failures during traffic regime transitions, and proposes bimodal mixture augmentation to improve coverage while preserving overall accuracy.