ExtractBench: A Benchmark for Schema-Guided Enterprise Document Extraction
Summary
ExtractBench is a new benchmark for schema-guided enterprise document extraction, evaluating value accuracy, record completeness, grounding, and cost across 4,869 pages of enterprise documents. The authors find that commercial VLMs struggle with long documents while coding agents are more accurate but costly, and LlamaExtract AgenticPlus leads on all metrics.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/03/26, 05:30 AM
Paper page - ExtractBench: A Benchmark for Schema-Guided Enterprise Document Extraction
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2607.29677
Abstract
Enterpriseworkflowsincreasinglyrelyonagentsforschema-guidedextraction:givenadocumentandauser-definedschema,theagentfaithfullyfollowstheschematoproducethecorrectoutputwithsourceevidenceasgroundingmetadata.WepresentExtractBench,abenchmarkforschema-guidedextractionand,toourknowledge,thefirsttoscorevalueaccuracy,recordcompletenessatscale,grounding,andmeasuredcosttogether.Theevaluationsystemcontains4,869pagesacross370enterprisedocuments,8businessdomains,and67documenttypes,withcleartagsdifferentiatingtheirchallengescenarios.Thescalableschemaandground-truthcurationpipelinecombinesindependent-systemagreementforrealdocuments,knownvaluesforsyntheticlists,andhumanverificationforforms.Wereportorder-insensitivevalueF1forvalueaccuracy,plustwogroundingmetricsforsourcetraceability:word-andpage-levelF1.CommercialVLMsperformwellonshortdocumentsbutoftentruncaterecordlistsonlongones,whilecodingagentsretainhigheraccuracyatmuchhighercost.LlamaExtractAgenticPlusranksfirstonallthreemetrics,withaccuracycomparabletocodingagentsatafractionofthecost.Datasetandevaluationcodeareavailableonhttps://huggingface.co/datasets/llamaindex/ExtractBench{HuggingFace}andhttps://github.com/run-llama/ExtractBench{GitHub}.
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607\.29677
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.29677 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.29677 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.29677 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
@llama_index: Most document extraction APIs can't tell you where a value came from. For ExtractBench, we scored grounding strictly: a…
ExtractBench is a new benchmark for document extraction that strictly scores grounding accuracy, showing VLMs and coding agents lack evidence while LlamaExtract Agentic Plus leads with high page-level and word-level performance.
@jerryjliu0: ParseBench is the first benchmark to include VLM chart understanding over enterprise documents. Existing benchmarks (Ch…
ParseBench introduces the first benchmark evaluating vision-language models on chart comprehension within full enterprise documents, addressing gaps in prior chart-only benchmarks.
@VikParuchuri: Structured extraction is hard to eval, and most benchmarks are biased, or have bad scoring/GT. That’s why we made OmniE…
OmniExtractBench is a new benchmark with 620 documents from multiple vendors, designed for fair evaluation of structured extraction, highlighting top performance by Datalab and Reducto.
Beyond Tables: Doc2DB-Bench for Relationally Faithful Document-to-Database Construction
Presents Doc2DB-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating LLM-based extraction of relational databases from long documents, with 203 instances across 42 schemas and seven domains.
@jerryjliu0: One of the interesting properties we’ve observed around schema-guided, complex document extraction tasks is that coding…
The article summarizes findings from the ParseBench paper, indicating that coding agents like Claude Code and Codex offer cost-effective baselines for schema-guided document extraction, especially on longer documents, compared to specialized OCR tools.