Is it ever possible to have a malicious LLM with a backdoor

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA 06/29/26, 11:52 AM News

Summary

Discusses the possibility of LLMs containing backdoors triggered by secret sentences or conditions, and the relative risks of closed vs open-source models.

I was just brainstorming of possibilities that the LLMs behave differently than normal if trained to recognize a specific secret sentence, and then unlocks a backdoor of malicious behavior. This sounds to me very possible at first glance. Don't get me wrong, the risk is relevant for ALL LLMs (closed & open ones), as long as we don't know the training data. I'm just trying to get the community ideas about such possibility and what are our lines of defense as long as we get the LLM having access to critical resources. My opinion is that closed source is riskier in this regards, because they can ultimately even change the behavior intentionally from the source. For local LLMs, since we're not exposing the LLM externally (i.e. we're the only prompters) it would limit the backdoor injection risks, but not entirely, because the LLM my have a sleeping trigger trained on (e.g. only wakes up when the date/time is matching a specific value). What do you think about such possibilities?

Original Article

Similar Articles

LLMs could control their host machines by exploiting inference engines

Hacker News Top

The article explores how malicious LLMs could exploit vulnerabilities in inference engines like vLLM to execute arbitrary code and control host machines, citing real-world CVEs.

A fundamental flaw leaves LLMs strikingly vulnerable to attack

MIT Technology Review

Researchers present a paper at ICML arguing that a fundamental flaw in how LLMs identify instructions makes them impossible to fully secure against attacks, demonstrating successful exploits against models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Alibaba, and DeepSeek.

Shared Latent Structures Enable Unified Backdoor Detection and Mitigation in LLMs

arXiv cs.AI

This paper identifies a shared latent mechanism across diverse backdoor behaviors in LLMs, using sparse autoencoders to detect and causally suppress these features, enabling unified backdoor detection and mitigation across models and attack types.

The only ethical way to use LLMs for research is with a closed-loop LLM Knowledge Base.

Reddit r/artificial

The article argues that using LLMs for research requires a closed-loop system like Karpathy's LLM Wiki or the Recall AI knowledge base to prevent hallucinations, ensuring all outputs are grounded in trusted source documents.

Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs

Hugging Face Daily Papers

A research paper reveals an architectural vulnerability in proprietary LLM APIs where encrypted reasoning traces can be intercepted and injected into weaker models to extract chain-of-thought, private data, and enable invisible prompt injection across Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google. The attack also recovers PII and credentials from public repositories.