Is it ever possible to have a malicious LLM with a backdoor
Summary
Discusses the possibility of LLMs containing backdoors triggered by secret sentences or conditions, and the relative risks of closed vs open-source models.
Similar Articles
LLMs could control their host machines by exploiting inference engines
The article explores how malicious LLMs could exploit vulnerabilities in inference engines like vLLM to execute arbitrary code and control host machines, citing real-world CVEs.
A fundamental flaw leaves LLMs strikingly vulnerable to attack
Researchers present a paper at ICML arguing that a fundamental flaw in how LLMs identify instructions makes them impossible to fully secure against attacks, demonstrating successful exploits against models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Alibaba, and DeepSeek.
Shared Latent Structures Enable Unified Backdoor Detection and Mitigation in LLMs
This paper identifies a shared latent mechanism across diverse backdoor behaviors in LLMs, using sparse autoencoders to detect and causally suppress these features, enabling unified backdoor detection and mitigation across models and attack types.
Controlled Decoding Attacks on Black-Box LLMs
This paper introduces a framework for jailbreaking black-box LLMs through text-only continuation interfaces, combining sample-based distribution reconstruction, risk-gated residual control, and speculative multi-token execution to bypass safety alignment without access to model weights or token probabilities.
The only ethical way to use LLMs for research is with a closed-loop LLM Knowledge Base.
The article argues that using LLMs for research requires a closed-loop system like Karpathy's LLM Wiki or the Recall AI knowledge base to prevent hallucinations, ensuring all outputs are grounded in trusted source documents.