FCC Chairman Brendan Carr proposes eliminating the national broadcast ownership cap, arguing that streaming and social media make it obsolete, while critics warn it could harm local journalism and reduce competition.
<figure>
<img alt="Federal Communications Commission logo in black and yellow" data-caption="Federal Communications Commission | Image: Kristen Radtke / The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Image: Kristen Radtke / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/06/FCC-stock-01.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0,0,100,100" />
<figcaption>
Federal Communications Commission | Image: Kristen Radtke / The Verge </figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Federal Communications Commission will vote next month on whether a single company can own broadcast stations that reach more than 39 percent of US TV households. </p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/07/15/exclusive-fcc-chairman-brendan-carr-restoring-balance-to-the-broadcast-airwaves/">In a <em>Breitbart</em> op-ed</a> on Wednesday, Republican Chair Brendan Carr announced an August 6th vote to end the national ownership cap rule, which was intended to prevent one company from dominating the media landscape and incentivize serving local communities. Carr argued the rise of social media and streaming platforms renders the rule obsolete, because national programmers can reach "100 percent of the country" without the need to access public airwaves. Under this reasoning, cap …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/966283/fcc-broadcast-ownership-cap-brendan-carr">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
# Brendan Carr plans to let broadcast giants dominate the airwaves
Source: [https://www.theverge.com/policy/966283/fcc-broadcast-ownership-cap-brendan-carr](https://www.theverge.com/policy/966283/fcc-broadcast-ownership-cap-brendan-carr)
[](https://www.theverge.com/authors/lauren-feiner)
Lauren Feiner
is a senior policy reporter at The Verge, covering the intersection of Silicon Valley and Capitol Hill\. She spent 5 years covering tech policy at CNBC, writing about antitrust, privacy, and content moderation reform\.
The Federal Communications Commission will vote next month on whether a single company can own broadcast stations that reach more than 39 percent of US TV households\.
[In a*Breitbart*op\-ed](https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/07/15/exclusive-fcc-chairman-brendan-carr-restoring-balance-to-the-broadcast-airwaves/)on Wednesday, Republican Chair Brendan Carr announced an August 6th vote to end the national ownership cap rule, which was intended to prevent one company from dominating the media landscape and incentivize serving local communities\. Carr argued the rise of social media and streaming platforms renders the rule obsolete, because national programmers can reach “100 percent of the country” without the need to access public airwaves\. Under this reasoning, capping local broadcast TV owners at 39 percent “is preventing them from gaining the same scale that their competitors are free to enjoy\.”
The FCC has[already said](https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2026/03/19/trumps-regulators-approve-tv-merger-that-set-off-conservative-media-feud-00837225)it’s waiving the ownership cap on a one\-time basis to allow a $6\.2 billion merger between Nexstar and Tegna\. A federal judge[put the deal on hold](https://deadline.com/2026/04/nexstar-tegna-merger-blocked-2-1236784770/)while a challenge by state attorneys general plays out\.
Carr’s opponents warn that repealing the rule could harm local journalism through reduced competition, and say that only Congress, which set the cap, has authority to raise or eliminate it\. “The Commission cannot waive away that limit simply because these corporate behemoths want to get out from under it,” Democratic FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez said in a[statement](https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-423096A1.pdf)\. Broadcasters are already free to make their own websites or cable news stations, just like everyone else, said Matt Wood, vice president of policy and general counsel at nonpartisan nonprofit Free Press\. “The national cap is not a special disadvantage for broadcasters,” he said in a statement\. “In fact, broadcasters have a special advantage with their exclusive licenses to use precious national airwaves the way they do\.”
Carr only needs the support of Republican Commissioner Olivia Trusty to approve an agenda item\. But even if the vote clears, it could still face a challenge over whether the FCC has the authority to get rid of the cap\.
**Follow topics and authors**from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates\.
- Lauren Feiner
The FCC plans to repeal the 39% national TV ownership cap, replacing it with case-by-case reviews, a move criticized as benefiting large broadcasters and potentially harming local news.
A bipartisan bill introduced by Senators Cruz and Wyden would allow Americans to sue government officials who illegally coerce social media, AI, or broadcast companies to remove content, creating new transparency requirements and empowering individuals like Jimmy Kimmel to sue FCC Chair Brendan Carr.
The Trump administration's FCC warns all broadcasters to comply with orders or face punishment, citing ABC's ongoing case where Disney was ordered to submit early license renewals over alleged discrimination violations. ABC challenges the order as unconstitutional and retaliatory.
The FCC has proposed scaling back or eliminating the $2 billion E-Rate program that provides internet discounts to schools and libraries, citing concerns over screen time. Critics argue the move misunderstands the program's importance.
The FCC is voting to eliminate a Biden-era rule requiring ISPs to itemize all passthrough fees on broadband price labels, allowing them to instead list a single 'up to' amount and making price information less accessible.