Quoting James Shore

Simon Willison's Blog News

Summary

James Shore argues that AI coding tools must proportionally reduce maintenance costs relative to increased output to prevent escalating technical debt.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/11/26, 10:49 PM

# A quote from James Shore Source: [https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/11/james-shore/](https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/11/james-shore/) 11th May 2026 > Your AI coding agent, the one you use to write code, needs to reduce your maintenance costs\. Not by a little bit, either\. You write code twice as quick now? Better hope you’ve halved your maintenance costs\. Three times as productive? One third the maintenance costs\. Otherwise, you’re screwed\. You’re trading a temporary speed boost for permanent indenture\. \[\.\.\.\] The math only works if the LLM*decreases*your maintenance costs, and by exactly the inverse of the rate it adds code\. If you double your output and your cost of maintaining that output, two times two means you’ve quadrupled your maintenance costs\. If you double your output and hold your maintenance costs steady, two times one means you’ve*still*doubled your maintenance costs\. —[James Shore](https://www.jamesshore.com/v2/blog/2026/you-need-ai-that-reduces-your-maintenance-costs),You Need AI That Reduces Maintenance Costs

Similar Articles

You Need AI That Reduces Maintenance Costs

Lobsters Hottest

James Shore argues that AI coding agents must significantly reduce long-term software maintenance costs to deliver real productivity gains, rather than just speeding up initial code writing. The article highlights the 'Wisdom of the Crowd' estimates on maintenance burdens and warns that without lowering these costs, teams face diminishing returns and technical debt.

I'm going back to writing code by hand

Hacker News Top

The author reflects on rebuilding a Kubernetes dashboard tool, arguing that while 'vibe-coding' with AI accelerates feature development, it often leads to architectural bloat and technical debt without human oversight.