Opus 5.5 Cost vs Performance on Terminal-Bench 4.0
Summary
This article evaluates the cost-effectiveness and performance of the Opus 5.5 AI model on the Terminal-Bench 4.0 benchmark.
No content available
Similar Articles
Opus 5.5 dominates on all three performance metrics from ArtificialAnalysis.ai
Opus 5.5 dominates all three performance metrics from ArtificialAnalysis.ai and offers a cost-effective alternative to Fable 5.1.
Benchmarking Opus 5 on SlopCodeBench
Benchmarking the performance of the Opus 5 model on the SlopCodeBench benchmark.
Opus 5.5 is here- better and cheaper
Opus 5.5, an AI model, has been released with enhanced performance and reduced cost.
@orca_build: Anthropic’s new Opus 4.8 scores 3.6% lower than GPT 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1… …but it’s noticeably better at UI tasks.…
Anthropic's Opus 4.8 scores 3.6% lower than GPT 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 but excels at UI tasks; Orca's orchestration enables Codex to delegate UI tasks to Claude Code.
Opus 5 benchmarks (30.2% on ARC-AGI3!!!)
Opus 5 achieves 30.2% on the ARC-AGI3 benchmark, marking a notable performance improvement.