@ericzakariasson: https://x.com/ericzakariasson/status/2072639126034137444
Summary
Fable is back in Cursor. This post shares a pattern using Fable as an orchestrator with Composer 2.5 as workers for efficient AI-assisted coding, along with tips for long-horizon cloud agents and rotating models.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/02/26, 12:21 PM
Fable is back, here’s how I use it in Cursor
Fable is back in Cursor, and here’s a pattern I’ve been exploring and some other ways I’ve been getting the most out of the model.
Fable as orchestrator, Composer as workers
It’s easy to put everything on a smart model. Most of an agent run is reading files, writing patches, and running checks, and you don’t need Fable rates for that. Instead, let Fable decide the subtasks, the order, and whether the result is done. Composer 2.5 does the scoped pieces, cheaper and faster, and can run them in parallel. Most of my chats are short Composer runs. Fable shows up less often, but those runs go longer.
You can put the routing in AGENTS.md or a .cursor/rules-rule so the orchestrator agent can use it.
Use Fable for planning and coordination. For anything you can scope into a clean subtask, start a Composer 2.5 subagent.
Give each subagent a clear goal, the relevant context, and what to bring back. Don’t have them invent the plan. Run independent pieces in parallel.
When they return, review the results before you merge anything. If something’s off, rewrite the brief and spin another, don’t silently patch over it yourself unless it’s trivial.
A good brief has:
-
one concern
-
enough context that the worker doesn’t re-explore the whole repo
-
a definition of done it can check on its own
-
a short report so the orchestrator can decide quickly
Fable alone still makes sense when the judgment is the work, whether that’s a hard design call, a gnarly bug that needs one coherent thread, or a plan that has to stay coupled. If you can’t name the subtasks, keep it one agent!
Long horizon cloud agents
The use case I reach for most is ultra long horizon work on Cloud Agents. A long refactor, a multi-surface feature with a real definition of done, an investigation across a big codebase. I hand it to Fable, give it something it can check itself against, and let it run. I check in from the iOS app for status, a look at what it’s doing, a nudge if it’s drifted.
Keeping up with the frontiers
If you only ever run one model, you start mistaking its habits for the ceiling of what agents can do. The frontier also moves every few weeks. Rotating is how I keep “what good looks like” current, from real work rather than benchmarks.
Similar Articles
Mythos Begets Fable, Cursor's Composer 2.5, Agents Building Agents
Andrew Ng discusses the rise of desktop AI agents and coding CLI tools, introduces the open-source OpenCoworker project, and examines agent harness designs where LLMs drive autonomous task execution.
@diegocabezas01: Use Fable 5 as orchestrator and Opus + Codex to execute (to save fable usage): Fable 5 (max reasoning) = orchestrator O…
A tweet thread explaining how to configure Fable 5 as the orchestrator with Opus and Sonnet as subagents, plus Codex as a peer engineer, in Claude Code to optimize model usage and task delegation.
@dzhng: Hot tip: use Fable-5 for planning and as the general orchestrator and reviewer, and Codex as the actual implementer so …
Tip to use Fable-5 as orchestrator and Codex as implementer to save credits, with a link to a library of composable AI agent skills for autonomous software development.
@DeRonin_: HOLY SH*T, got released Fable-class model in public from Japan by coding and research benchmarks it's literally equival…
Sakana AI released Fugu Ultra, a multi-agent orchestration system accessible via a single model API, achieving performance competitive with Fable and Mythos models.
@flowstated: fable 5 composer 2.5 fast
Fable 5 integrates with Composer 2.5 Fast for enhanced AI code generation capabilities.