@Cander_zhu: In the past two days, @AnatoliKopadze posted two blockbuster contents, and I read both carefully: 1. His ultra-detailed long article "Loops explained: Claude, GPT, Mira and what actually works" (currently over 8...
Summary
This article discusses the application of Loop Engineering in AI agent workflows, focusing on Anatoli Kopadze's detailed explanation of loops and Peter Steinberger's talk at AI Engineer Europe, emphasizing the importance of automated verification loops and acceptance criteria.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/24/26, 10:30 PM
Over the past couple of days, @AnatoliKopadze dropped two重磅 pieces of content, and I read them both carefully:
- His ultra-detailed longform piece, “Loops explained: Claude, GPT, Mira and what actually works” (now over 8.9 million views)
- Peter Steinberger (creator of OpenClaw) delivering a 19‑minute talk at AI Engineer Europe
Combining @addyosmani’s article “Loop Engineering” with both of Anatoli’s pieces yields a huge amount of insight.
Anatoli’s article lays out the low-level logic of Loops with exceptional clarity:
- A prompt is “you give step-by-step instructions”; a Loop is “you give a goal + acceptance criteria and let the Agent run the result on its own”
- A reliable Loop usually needs these five parts: Automation (trigger), Skill (reusable instructions), Sub-agents (separate the coder from the code reviewer), Connectors (actual execution of actions), Verifier (hard‑core acceptance checking)
And Peter, as the creator of OpenClaw, shares his real-world workflow in the video:
“Each loop is so much faster now that I ship more than ever with way less effort.”
His core takeaways:
- The goal isn’t writing the perfect prompt — it’s designing a closed‑loop that can verify itself
- The Judge (acceptance criteria) determines the Loop’s success or failure; best to use deterministic checks like tests, type checks, diffs, etc.
- Structure your project for the Agent, not against it
I really hope everyone reads these three pieces — ideally together (Addy’s Loop Engineering + Anatoli’s long article + Peter’s video). Theory + practice + framework complement each other, making the overall effect much stronger.
I’ve personally been building a small Loop around “structuring new notes in Obsidian” — still early days, but I can already feel the shift from manual organization to automated workflows.
For anyone interested in Loop Engineering, I strongly recommend reading all three. Theory + real‑world examples + systemic thinking — that combination works best.
Are you leaning toward learning the theory framework first, or would you rather dive straight into practical workflows?
#LoopEngineering
Anatoli Kopadze (@AnatoliKopadze): Peter Steinberger, the guy who built OpenClaw just shared his actual workflow:
“Each loop is so much faster now that I ship more than ever with way less effort.”
19 minutes from the person who knows more about AI agents and loops than anyone else.
Watch it, then read the full
Similar Articles
@xiaogaifun: Andrew Ng explains Loop Engineering in just a few words. Andrew Ng is remarkably sharp. In his Newsletter a couple of days ago, he clearly laid out the essence of this new term—Loop Engineering—in just a few sentences. Just finished reading his article, so here’s my take on it. …
Andrew Ng interprets the concept of Loop Engineering, where AI autonomously completes development tasks through a cycle of writing code, testing, and fixing. He expands this to developer feedback loops and real-world feedback loops, emphasizing the critical role of humans in providing contextual information.
@Lonely__MH: Prompts Are Dead, Loop Engineering Has Arrived! Recently, the concept of Loop Engineering in AI programming has sparked widespread discussion in the tech community. In a recent interview, Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code, shared what's happening inside the team…
Claude Code head Boris Cherny proposes that AI programming is shifting from prompt engineering to Loop Engineering. In the future, developers' core task will be designing automated loops rather than writing prompts—a trend that could level the development playing field.
@FeitengLi: The loop / loop engineering that's been trending on Twitter recently comes from this May 4 interview — Anthropic's Claude Code creator Boris Cherny (author of a TypeScript book, a coder at heart)...
Anthropic's Claude Code creator Boris Cherny systematically introduced the loop engineering method at Sequoia AI Ascent 2026, stating that programming is now 100% done by AI, and predicted that software will become as democratized as the printing press.
@Phoenixyin13: What does a good Loop actually need? This article finally addresses the most valuable part. The number one priority is a verification mechanism. AI cannot grade itself; it will give itself full marks. There must be an objective way to check, such as code passing tests, the article meeting word count and structure requirements, numbers matching up, etc. Without this, the loop is just a waste…
The article discusses the three most important elements of an AI loop: verification mechanism, memory, and stop condition, and points out the cost-effectiveness issues of current fully automated loops.
@yanhua1010: https://x.com/yanhua1010/status/2072170080969138616
The Claude Code team published a blog post introducing the /goal and /loop features. The article analyzes the paradigm shift in AI programming from single-turn conversations to iterative operations, detailing four types of loops (turn-based, goal-based, scheduled, proactive) and their applicable scenarios, while proposing the execution layer concept of Harness Engineering.