SO-101 Bench: Accessible Spatial Manipulation
Summary
SO-101 Bench 推出一个基于 Isaac Lab 数字孪生的低成本机器人臂语言条件空间操作仿真基准,结果显示混合 LLM 智能体(83.2%)显著优于学习型 VLA 策略(约61%),且仿真与真实硬件上的策略排名完全一致。
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/28/26, 01:52 AM
Paper page - SO-101 Bench: Accessible Spatial Manipulation
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.36420
Abstract
A simulated benchmark for language-conditioned spatial manipulation on low-cost robot arms reveals that hybrid LLM agents outperform learned vision-language-action policies, with ranking consistency between simulation and real hardware.
Low-cost arms such as the SO-101 have become the most common entry point to robot learning, yet no released policy performs spatially constrained, language-conditioned tasks on them out of the box, and existingSO-101 benchmarks run only on physical hardware with simple tasks and few held-out objects. We introduceSO-101 Bench, a simulated benchmark for language-conditionedspatial manipulationbuilt on anIsaac Labdigital twinof a real SO-101 setup. It has four tasks scored as five families, 138 objects in seen, unseen-instance and unseen-class splits, 916 evaluation episodes with subsets for held-out appearances,rotate-to-fit planningandocclusion memory, and 3,629 simulated demonstrations on which every learned policy is fine-tuned under an equal compute budget. The twin ranks policies as the real robot does: five policies trained without real data, fourVLAsand anLLM agent, keep their exact ranking when the same weights run on the physical arm in an unseen environment with unseen objects (Spearman rho = 1.00, MMRV = 0.000), although simulation overestimates success. Across nineVLAsandworld-action models, the best learned policies score near 61%, with spatial placement, unseen object classes androtate-to-fit planningremaining open. AnLLM agentthat writes code and hands grasping to a learned policy scores 83.2%, and an ablation shows that this lead comes from the choice of harness and the choice of language model.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub28Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610\.36420
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.36420 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.36420 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.36420 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper1
Similar Articles
Words to World: Benchmarking LLMs in Interactive Physical Environments
该论文提出了一个用于评估大语言模型在闭环物理交互中表现的基准,模型需通过连接机械臂、摄像头和传感器的系统在真实环境中执行任务并根据物理反馈调整行动。实验揭示了LLM在物理行动中的常见失败模式,如幻觉状态变化、糟糕的异常恢复和不稳定的长程规划。
RynnVLA-Latent: Scaling Robotic Manipulation Foundation Models with 3D-Grounded Latent Actions
RynnVLA-Latent 提出用 30.1K 小时异构视频学习 3D-grounded 潜在动作,预训练 4B 视觉-语言-动作策略,在 LIBERO(98.8%)、RoboTwin 2.0 及真实机器人操作任务上取得领先成功率,无需针对基准的专门调优。
HandsOn: A Large-Scale Simulation Benchmark for Generalizable Dexterous Manipulation
HandsOn 是一个跨具身灵巧操作仿真基准与平台,涵盖 5 种机械臂、6 种灵巧手和约 200 个资产,并提供 18,000 条人类演示与 66 项任务。评测显示当前多任务策略与基于基础模型的控制存在巨大差距,最佳多任务策略在 Core-50 上成功率仅 29.1%。
MA-Bench: Measuring Operational Planning in Language Models
Scale AI 与 Data Machines 推出 MA-Bench 基准,通过军事任务分析场景评估语言模型在不完整、矛盾信息下的操作规划判断能力;20 个前沿模型中最佳仅答对 62% 的评分项,最弱环节是需要推断的判断。
Systematic Multi-Agent Vision-and-Language Navigation: Formulation, Benchmark, and Method
提出首个系统化的多智能体视觉-语言导航(MAVLN)形式化框架,包含11,724个跨145个场景的多机器人协作任务,并提出基于LLM子任务调度与共享拓扑记忆的协调系统TRISS作为基线。