Prompt injection is still breaking agent systems I built a gateway that enforces instruction/data separation at runtime
Summary
A gateway that enforces instruction/data separation at runtime to protect agent systems from prompt injection attacks.
Similar Articles
I built a gateway to make prompt injection structurally impossible in agent workflows (design approach, not a model fix)
A developer created a gateway that structurally prevents prompt injection in agent workflows, focusing on architecture rather than model-level fixes.
A system-level approach to prompt injection: separating instruction and data channels in LLM agents [P]
This paper proposes Sentinel Gateway, a middleware layer that enforces strict separation between trusted instruction channels and untrusted data channels to mitigate prompt injection in LLM agents, using signed runtime authorization tokens and offering audit logging capabilities.
How are you testing local coding-agent work gates against prompt injection?
A discussion about testing local coding-agent work gates against indirect prompt injection, focusing on evidence trust and verification challenges in agent workflows.
How are you all handling prompt injection for agents that read external content?
A discussion about handling prompt injection attacks in AI agents that read external content like emails and webpages, exploring production-level defenses and the subtle threats beyond obvious patterns.
What does your prompt injection defense actually look like? Found 47/50 customer agents had holes in the same 5 places.
An audit of 50 production AI agent deployments found that 47 had critical prompt injection vulnerabilities, primarily in five common patterns including direct override and indirect injection via RAG.