Anthropic claims AWS AI revenue, while OpenAI only claims their share of MSFT AI revenue
Summary
The article highlights how Anthropic books AWS AI revenue as gross revenue, while OpenAI only books its net share from Microsoft, revealing differences in reported revenue and financial strategies.
Similar Articles
OpenAI Disputes Anthropic Revenue by Billions
OpenAI's CRO claims Anthropic's $30 billion run rate is overstated by ~$8 billion due to gross accounting on cloud reseller transactions; the SEC may need to set precedent for AI companies using hyperscaler distribution.
@rohanpaul_ai: Microsoft just disclosed for the first time taht OpenAI supplied ~70% of Microsoft's AI revenue, per new filings. based…
Microsoft disclosed for the first time that OpenAI accounts for roughly 70% of its AI revenue, with most of the $24.1B stemming from OpenAI's cloud billing and related costs.
Analysts Estimate That More Than 70% of Amazon, Microsoft and Google’s AI Revenues Come From OpenAI and Anthropic
Analysts estimate that more than 70% of Amazon, Microsoft, and Google's AI revenues come from OpenAI and Anthropic, raising questions about whether the AI demand boom is sustainable or a bubble.
OpenAI and Anthropic: two different business models
Forbes analyzes the contrasting financial trajectories of OpenAI and Anthropic as they approach public listings, highlighting Anthropic's enterprise-driven profitability versus OpenAI's consumer-scale losses.
Microsoft logs $3.2B from Anthropic investment, but OpenAI was a mixed bag
Microsoft reported a $3.2 billion gain from its Anthropic investment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, while its OpenAI investment was written down by $600 million, though it gained $5 billion for the full year.