Rebuilding my custom agentic AI because the original architecture was too heavy
Summary
The author is rebuilding a custom agentic AI to replace a heavy LLM-based architecture with a lightweight system featuring its own intelligence layer for capabilities like perception and decision-making.
Similar Articles
As we scale toward agentic, multimodal systems combining LLMs, RLHF, tool-use, and retrieval-augmented generation, what practical architecture best balances reliability, alignment, and cost?
The article debates whether future AI systems should use a unified agent stack or modular ensembles, and advocates for more realistic robustness benchmarks beyond static evaluations.
Most “agentic AI” conversations feel too abstract. Here is how my agentic research system looks like
The author shares a practical breakdown of an agentic research system they built to identify and evaluate AI use cases within companies. The system uses six agents for discovery, evaluation, and context extraction, emphasizing human-in-the-loop decision-making over full autonomy.
I built an AI that acts without being told to. No frameworks. No prompts. No roles. Here's what I learned.
A developer built LIA, a persistent cognitive ecosystem that achieves genuine autonomy through architectural design (memory, self-generated rules, private domain) rather than prompts, outperforming a standard LLM in the same environment.
How I built an open-source skill that forces AI agents into principal-architect mode
A developer describes creating an open-source skill that forces AI agents to adopt a principal-architect mode, enhancing their reasoning and design capabilities.
@qinzytech: https://x.com/qinzytech/status/2066585405479371092
A technical analysis of two approaches to building self-evolving AI agents: model-based (via architecture like SSMs or transformer with fast-weight updates, and training methods) and harness-based (via memory or meta harness that can rewrite itself). The author provides practical recommendations for different audiences.