@tom_doerr: Turns AI coding chats into a repeatable engineering workflow https://github.com/codeaholicguy/ai-devkit…
Summary
AI DevKit is a tool that adds a structured engineering workflow to AI coding agents, incorporating requirements, design, verification, and memory to replace one-off chats with repeatable processes.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/11/26, 11:45 PM
Turns AI coding chats into a repeatable engineering workflow
https://t.co/4ZoG6o2PT0 https://t.co/oOmd8L8UGa
codeaholicguy/ai-devkit
Source: https://github.com/codeaholicguy/ai-devkit
AI DevKit
English | 中文
Your team of AI coding agents is fast, eager, and reckless. Make them work like senior engineers instead.

AI DevKit turns one-off AI coding chats into a repeatable software delivery workflow: requirements, design, planning, implementation, tests, verification, memory, and review.
- Stops prompt-and-pray coding —
/new-requirementmakes the agent clarify the problem before touching code - Blocks fake “done” claims —
verifyrequires fresh test/build output before completion claims - Keeps project knowledge alive —
@ai-devkit/memorystores decisions, conventions, and fixes across sessions - Catches drift before push —
/code-reviewaudits the diff against the design and requirements docs - One console for all of them —
agent consoleis a live TUI dashboard for control all your running agents, no matter the provider
One config. All coding agents: Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, opencode, Antigravity, Amp, Windsurf, Kilo Code, Roo Code.
Run npx ai-devkit@latest init and your agent gets:
| What you need | What AI DevKit installs |
|---|---|
| A plan before code | /new-requirement, /review-design, and /execute-plan |
| Evidence before “done” | verify gates tied to fresh test/build output |
| Memory across sessions | Local SQLite memory exposed through MCP and CLI |
| Same behavior across agents | Generated config for the coding tools your team uses |
Who this is for
Developers who use AI coding agents daily and are tired of:
- re-rigging
CLAUDE.md/.cursor/rules/AGENTS.mdfor every project - the agent forgetting yesterday’s conventions
- “I’ve successfully implemented the feature” with a red build
- the agent diving into code without a plan and producing the wrong thing
Before AI DevKit, your agent is a capable but inconsistent chatbot. After AI DevKit, it has a workflow, memory, verification gates, and reusable skills that travel with your repo.
| Without AI DevKit | With AI DevKit |
|---|---|
| You repeat project rules in every chat | The agent searches project memory and docs first |
| The agent jumps from prompt to code | The agent moves through requirements, design, and plan |
| “Done” means the agent stopped editing | “Done” requires fresh verification output |
| Each agent needs separate hand-maintained rules | One config reconciles commands, skills, and MCP setup |
Start in 30 seconds
npx ai-devkit@latest init
One wizard. Pick your agents, install the workflow, and give them the same operating model. It writes project-local files you can review and commit. Re-run it whenever your agent list or workflow changes.
Here’s what lands in your repo:
your-project/
├── .ai-devkit.json # single source of truth (re-run init anytime)
├── .claude/ # or .cursor/, .codex/, etc. per agent you picked
│ ├── skills/ # dev-lifecycle, verify, memory, tdd, ...
│ ├── commands/ # /new-requirement, /execute-plan, /code-review, ...
│ └── settings.json # MCP servers wired up (incl. @ai-devkit/memory)
└── docs/ai/
├── requirements/ # phase 1 — what to build, why
├── design/ # phase 2 — how it'll be built
├── planning/ # phase 3 — task-by-task plan
├── implementation/ # phase 4 — execution notes
└── testing/ # phase 5 — coverage strategy
Or get the full engineering workflow stack
Save templates/senior-engineer.yaml locally and run:
ai-devkit init --template ./senior-engineer.yaml
Bundles the eight built-in skills with curated additions from Anthropic, Vercel, and others — TDD, frontend design, webapp testing, doc co-authoring, React best practices, security review, and more.
A feature, end-to-end
You: /new-requirement add OAuth login with Google
Agent: Searches memory for prior auth conventions. Asks clarifying
questions about scope, users, success criteria. Drafts
docs/ai/{requirements,design,planning}/feature-oauth-login.md
in a feature worktree. Stops before coding.
You: /review-design feature-oauth-login
Agent: Audits the design doc against the requirements. Flags gaps,
proposes fixes — before any code gets written.
You: /execute-plan feature-oauth-login
Agent: Works the planning doc task-by-task. Updates progress after
each task. The `verify` skill blocks a task from being
marked done without fresh test/build output.
You: /code-review
Agent: Audits the diff against the design doc — scope creep,
missing tests, edge cases the requirements named —
before you push.
What changes in the agent
The flow above is powered by eight built-in skills, each addressing a failure mode developers see in real AI coding sessions:
| Failure mode | AI DevKit behavior |
|---|---|
| Agent starts coding too early | dev-lifecycle forces requirements, design, planning, implementation, tests, and review |
| Agent says “done” without proof | verify blocks completion claims without fresh test/build evidence |
| Agent forgets project decisions | memory gives it a local, searchable knowledge base across sessions and projects |
| New behavior ships without tests | tdd pushes test-first implementation |
| Debugging becomes guess-and-patch | structured-debug makes it reproduce, hypothesize, fix, and verify |
| Existing code is opaque | document-code maps entry points, dependencies, and behavior |
| Implementation gets bloated | simplify-implementation reduces complexity before code ships |
| Documentation is hard to follow | technical-writer audits docs for novice-user clarity |
Need more? ai-devkit skill add <registry> <skill> pulls from 30+ publishers — Anthropic, Vercel, Supabase, Microsoft, Google.
Works with every coding agent
One .ai-devkit.json configures all of them. Add a new agent to your team without rewriting your rules.
| Agent | Setup | Remote control |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | yes | yes |
| Gemini CLI | yes | yes |
| Codex CLI | yes | yes |
| opencode | yes | testing |
| Pi | — | yes |
| Cursor | yes | — |
| GitHub Copilot | yes | — |
| Antigravity | yes | — |
| Amp | yes | — |
| Windsurf | testing | — |
| Kilo Code | testing | — |
| Roo Code | testing | — |
Setup — ai-devkit init writes the agent’s config (rules, MCP servers, skills, slash commands) so it follows the same workflow.
Remote control — drive running sessions from ai-devkit agent send and route them through external channels.
Operate agents like infrastructure
AI DevKit also ships an agent control plane — drive sessions from the CLI, supervise from anywhere:
# List running sessions across providers
ai-devkit agent list
# Send a prompt to a running session and wait for the response
ai-devkit agent send "run the tests and report back" --id <agent-name> --wait
# Pipe multi-line output into a running session
npm test 2>&1 | ai-devkit agent send --id <agent-name> --stdin
# Pipe a session through Telegram — operate your agent from your phone
ai-devkit channel start telegram --agent <agent-name> --daemon
Useful for long-running tasks, scheduled work, or checking on an agent from your phone at lunch.
How is this different from CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules, or AGENTS.md?
Those files are static instructions the agent re-reads. AI DevKit gives the agent a workflow layer: phase docs, slash commands, skills loaded on demand, local searchable memory, verification gates, and a control surface that works across agents. The rules still matter, but AI DevKit makes them operational.
| Static rules files | AI DevKit |
|---|---|
| Tell the agent what you prefer | Installs commands that drive the next step |
| Depend on the agent remembering every rule | Stores and searches reusable project knowledge |
| Cannot prove a task is complete | Requires fresh command output before completion claims |
| Are different for each agent | Generates the right files for each supported agent |
What this isn’t
- Not a smarter LLM. Bad models stay bad — this raises the floor on process, not on raw capability.
- Not a magic “write the feature for me” button. You still review the requirements doc, accept the design, and read the diff. The workflow makes that review possible (artifacts to point at) instead of impossible (chat scrollback).
- Not a hosted service. MIT-licensed, runs locally, no telemetry. Memory is a SQLite file on your disk. The agent control plane talks to the agent SDKs you already use.
Documentation & community
- Full guides, workflow patterns, skill authoring → ai-devkit.com/docs
- Release notes → CHANGELOG.md
- Contributing → CONTRIBUTING.md
git clone https://github.com/Codeaholicguy/ai-devkit.git
cd ai-devkit && npm install && npm run build
License
MIT
Similar Articles
@tom_doerr: Encodes senior engineer workflows for AI coding agents https://github.com/addyosmani/agent-skills…
A GitHub repository that packages production-grade engineering skills for AI coding agents, encoding senior engineer workflows and quality gates into slash commands like /spec, /plan, /build, etc., with setup instructions for Claude Code, Cursor, and other tools.
@tom_doerr: Zero-config multi-agent AI coding setup https://github.com/lee-to/ai-factory…
AI Factory is a zero-configuration developer tool that sets up a multi-agent AI coding environment with built-in skills, spec-driven development, and support for various AI agents like Claude, Cursor, and Codex, allowing users to start building with a single command.
@tom_doerr: Orchestrates AI coding agents with persistent memory https://github.com/RedPlanetHQ/core…
CORE is an open-source AI operating layer that orchestrates coding agents with persistent memory, coordinating tasks across tools and agents.
@TechWithTimm: Most AI coding tools still depend on you staying in the loop. But Devin can take a task, keep working in the cloud, and…
This tweet promotes Devin, an AI coding tool that works autonomously in the cloud and can produce pull requests without user supervision, linking to a tutorial video.
@tom_doerr: Free courses and code for building autonomous AI agents https://github.com/avinash201199/free-ai-agents-resources…
A curated GitHub repository aggregating free courses, code examples, tutorials, and resources for building autonomous AI agents, targeting developers from beginner to advanced levels.