@XAMTO_AI: 别再拿Claude Code当聊天机器人用了,真正会玩的人早就给它塞满了黑客脑子。 51个实战技能 574+报告模板 24类漏洞打法,一键上身,菜鸟秒变老练赏金猎人。 你还在那儿观望,别人已经开始收漏洞奖金了。 https://githu…
摘要
介绍Claude-BugHunter,一个为Claude Code设计的技能包,包含71个技能、15个斜杠命令和681份公开报告模式,旨在将Claude Code转化为高级漏洞赏金猎人或红队操作员。
查看缓存全文
缓存时间: 2026/06/15 00:54
别再拿Claude Code当聊天机器人用了,真正会玩的人早就给它塞满了黑客脑子。
1️⃣ 51个实战技能 2️⃣ 574+报告模板 3️⃣ 24类漏洞打法,一键上身,菜鸟秒变老练赏金猎人。 你还在那儿观望,别人已经开始收漏洞奖金了。 🔗https://t.co/9KYNfYFR2R https://t.co/5GrxKRQ7GZ
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter
Source: https://github.com/elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter
claude-bughunter
A self-contained Claude skill bundle for bug hunting and external red-team work · 71 skills · 15 slash commands · 681 disclosed-report patterns across 24 core vulnerability classes · enterprise identity + infrastructure attack matrices · engagement-folder scaffolding · Burp MCP integration · battle-tested across authorized red-team and bug-hunting engagements, plus public training platforms (DVWA, OWASP Juice Shop, Hacker101, testphp.vulnweb.com).
Built by Sachin Sharma — Bug Hunting & GenAI Security Research.
What is this?
claude-bughunter is a drop-in skill bundle for the Claude Code skills system. Install once and Claude Code stops being a chatbot and starts behaving like a senior bug-hunting researcher or red-team operator: it knows the techniques, the chain templates, the VRT mappings, the platform CVE chains, and the hygiene — and it stays in scope.
Four layers stack:
- Think —
bb-methodology+redteam-mindset: the 5-phase non-linear workflow, critical-thinking framework, and red-team operator discipline. - Hunt webapps — 48
hunt-*skills curated from 681 disclosed HackerOne reports: per-class detection patterns, payloads, bypass tables, and chain templates. - Hit the perimeter — enterprise platform chains (M365/Entra, Okta, vCenter, SSL-VPN appliances, SharePoint, cloud IAM): current 2024–2026 CVE chains + post-credential escalation.
- Ship it —
triage-validation+ reporting +evidence-hygiene: the 7-Question Gate, VRT-aware severity, OOS rebuttals, PII redaction, and red-team deliverables.
All triggered automatically by topic — describe what you’re testing in plain English and the relevant skill loads. No invocation by name.
Quickstart
Option A — install as a Claude Code plugin (recommended). From inside Claude Code:
/plugin marketplace add elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter
/plugin install claude-bughunter@elementalsouls
All 71 skills + 15 commands load namespaced under claude-bughunter: and update when you bump the plugin version — no files copied into ~/.claude/.
Option B — copy install (no plugin system / pin to a clone):
git clone https://github.com/elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter.git
cd Claude-BugHunter
bash scripts/install.sh # copies skills + commands into ~/.claude/
That’s it. Open Claude Code and describe what you’re testing in plain English — the right skill loads automatically, no invocation by name:
> Testing acme.com — an in-scope HackerOne target. Run recon and rank the surface.
⟳ loading skills: web2-recon, offensive-osint, bb-methodology …
→ subdomain enum (subfinder + crt.sh) … 47 hosts
→ live hosts (httpx) … 12 · tech fingerprint … 6 distinct stacks
→ ranked surface: api.acme.com (GraphQL, introspection ON) ← start here
auth.acme.com (OAuth, SSO) ← hunt-oauth
Next: want me to probe the GraphQL introspection + OAuth redirect_uri?
→ Full Installation guide · Usage guide · searchable skill catalog.
The block above is an illustrative transcript. To record a real demo of your own session:
asciinema rec demo.cast→ upload to asciinema.org and drop the badge here.
Runs on four harnesses
The skills are plain Agent Skills — the same SKILL.md format that Claude Code · OpenCode · OpenAI Codex CLI · Hermes Agent all load. One command installs them everywhere:
bash scripts/install.sh --all --burp-mcp
--all copies the skills to every harness’s path (~/.claude/skills, ~/.agents/skills, ~/.hermes/skills); --burp-mcp wires the Burp MCP server into each. The full knowledge layer ports to all four — the slash commands and /hunt engine stay Claude-Code-only by design.
Scope — what this bundle is for, and what it isn’t
This bundle covers the external attack surface — anything reachable from the internet without first compromising an internal endpoint.
In scope
- Bug bounty hunting — web apps, APIs, SaaS, GraphQL, OAuth, JWT, file upload, IDOR, SSRF, RCE chains
- Web application pentesting — full hunt-* coverage of OWASP-mapped bug classes + discipline rules
- External red-team engagements — initial-access against internet-facing enterprise estate: M365 / Entra ID, Okta-as-IdP, SharePoint on-prem (ToolShell + legacy SOAP), VMware vCenter / Workspace ONE, SSL VPN appliances (Cisco / Fortinet / Citrix / Palo Alto / Pulse / SonicWall / F5), Android APK red-team, supply-chain recon
- Cloud misconfig + post-credential escalation — public S3, IMDS chains, STS AssumeRole, cross-account confused-deputy
- Recon + OSINT — subdomain enum, identity-fabric mapping, certificate transparency, JS analysis, secret scanning
- Reporting — H1, Bugcrowd (VRT-aware), Intigriti, Immunefi, plus client-facing red-team deliverable format
Out of scope (deliberate — not gaps, design decisions)
- Internal Active Directory attacks — BloodHound, Kerberoasting, ASREProast, DCSync, Pass-the-Hash, AD CS abuse, ntlmrelayx, Responder, PetitPotam, etc. Different operational risk profile; needs different tooling and judgment. Future bundle, not this one.
- C2 frameworks — Cobalt Strike, Sliver, Mythic, Havoc, BRC4 tradecraft. Out of scope for external-only engagement model.
- Post-exploit / persistence / lateral — Mimikatz/comsvcs LSASS dumping, golden/silver tickets, named-pipe impersonation, persistence (registry, scheduled tasks, WMI events, COM hijacking), token theft. These start after the perimeter has already broken — different bundle territory.
- Evasion — AMSI bypass, ETW patching, AV/EDR bypass. Tied to C2 tradecraft above.
- iOS pentesting / hardware / RF / ICS — out of scope by design.
- Binary exploitation / kernel pwn / browser internals — different skill universe.
If you’re running an internal red team that includes domain-takeover chains via Kerberos or lateral movement, this bundle won’t help you in those phases — and we’d rather say that up front than have you find out mid-engagement. The external surface handoff to internal-RT tooling (Impacket, NetExec, CrackMapExec, Rubeus, Certify, BloodHound) is intentionally outside our scope. Coverage for internal AD and post-exploit may come in a future update.
What’s inside
71 skills, auto-loaded by topic — no invocation by name. Coverage across the external attack surface:
| Category | # | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Web application hunting | 13 | XSS, SQLi, SSRF, IDOR, LFI, SSTI, XXE, CSRF, CORS, open-redirect |
| Authentication & identity | 7 | auth-bypass, session, OAuth, SAML, MFA-bypass, ATO |
| API & infrastructure | 15 | GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket, API-misconfig, host-header, RCE |
| Advanced & concurrency | 6 | race-condition, HTTP smuggling, deserialization, cache-poison |
| Framework-specific | 4 | Next.js, Node.js, Laravel, Spring Boot |
| Enterprise identity & cloud ★ | 3 | M365/Entra, Okta, cloud-IAM-deep |
| Infrastructure & appliance ★ | 4 | VMware vCenter, enterprise VPN, SharePoint, ASP.NET/NTLM |
| Red-team tradecraft ★ | 4 | redteam-mindset, APK pipeline, supply-chain recon, mid-engagement IR |
| Recon & OSINT | 4 | web2-recon, offensive-osint, subdomain |
| Workflow, reporting & specialized | 11 | methodology, triage-validation, evidence-hygiene, VRT-aware reporting |
Full searchable catalog → docs/skills.md. Also ships 15 slash commands (/hunt, /recon, /report, …) and a deterministic engagement engine (engine/) that maps a target’s attack surface and routes each finding to the skill that handles it.
How it works
A 6-phase, non-linear workflow — recon → map & rank → hunt → validate → report — with scope enforced in code and a 7-Question Gate before anything is submitted. Two ways to drive it:
- Plain English — describe what you’re testing and the relevant skill loads automatically.
/huntscaffold +cbhCLI — engagement-folder structure, state, and orchestration.
→ Usage guide & worked example · 6-phase architecture & skill-to-phase map · cbh CLI
Documentation
| Doc | Contents |
|---|---|
README.md | This file — overview, quickstart, scope, skill summary |
INSTALL.md | Full setup with Burp MCP integration and optional skill regenerator |
USAGE.md | Workflow walkthrough · decision tree · worked engagement example |
docs/architecture.md | 6-phase architecture · skill-to-phase mapping · engagement composition |
docs/cbh-cli.md | cbh CLI — native runner orchestrating recon + classify + triage + report |
docs/cve-coverage.md | CISA KEV coverage snapshot — refreshed weekly via the workflow template at docs/automation/cve-refresh.yml.template |
docs/credits.md | Full attribution: 43 original skills + 8 vendored from upstream |
CONTRIBUTING.md | PR guidelines · skill quality standards · scope |
SECURITY.md | Authorized-use posture · responsible disclosure · what’s excluded |
LICENSE | MIT |
Why this exists
Most bug-hunting Claude setups are either too generic (one big “security” prompt) or too fragmented (you bookmark 30 disclosed reports and re-read them every engagement). Neither scales past the second target.
This bundle was built and validated through authorized engagements that exposed different capability gaps:
Bug-bounty engagement — surfaced four gaps a starter 3-skill stack could not close:
- No hypothesis discipline — drafts written before validation → wasted hours, hurt validity ratio
- No per-program reporting tactics — VRT defaults auto-downgraded P3-worthy findings to P4
- No engagement coordination — findings, evidence, and submission IDs scattered across folders
- No evidence hygiene — screenshots leaked cookies and victim PII
External red-team engagement — exposed five additional gaps that bug-bounty defaults made worse:
- Conservative defaults retracted real findings — WAPT mindset stopped tests early on defended targets where red-team continuation would have surfaced bypass chains →
redteam-mindset - No mid-engagement situational awareness — client SOC patched confirmed SQLi within 30 min; external attacker locked 14 accounts during a live test session — both invisible without explicit detection methodology →
mid-engagement-ir-detection - No enterprise-platform attack chains — M365 + Entra ID, on-prem SharePoint, Cisco SSL VPN, vCenter, and 7 Android APKs all needed current 2024-2026 CVE knowledge and platform-specific tradecraft →
m365-entra-attack,okta-attack,hunt-sharepoint,hunt-aspnet,hunt-ntlm-info,vmware-vcenter-attack,enterprise-vpn-attack,apk-redteam-pipeline - No client-facing deliverable format — bug-bounty report templates don’t fit enterprise red-team where output is a 50KB+ MD + DOCX with embedded screenshots →
redteam-report-template - No post-credential escalation model — when recon yielded credentials (AWS keys, JWTs, GCP JSON), it was unclear what they granted or how to escalate →
cloud-iam-deep
The per-class hunt-* skills address gap-zero (“what should I look for in webapps”) — the original 24 codifying patterns from 681 disclosed HackerOne reports, with 20+ framework/surface skills added by the community v3 expansion — Claude knows the actual chain templates real triagers paid for, not abstract OWASP Top 10. The enterprise-platform and red-team-tradecraft layers address what bug-bounty alone cannot: external red-team engagements against monitored enterprise targets.
Roadmap
- HackerOne MCP integration (currently only Burp MCP wired in)
- Per-engagement memory layer — pattern recall across targets
-
Industry-specific hunt skills —
hunt-fintech-graphql,hunt-healthcare-fhir,hunt-gov-compliance -
Program-rules-parser skill — auto-generate structured
scope.mdfrom program text -
Refresh
hunt-*skills with newer disclosed reports (re-runpublic-skills-builder) -
Additional enterprise-platform skills —
citrix-netscaler-deep,f5-bigip-attack,ad-cs-attack(AD Certificate Services) - Refresh enterprise-VPN CVE matrix quarterly to track 2026 advisories
- Update architecture SVG to include the 7-skill enterprise-platform layer
Sponsors
Atlas Cloud is a full-modal AI inference platform that gives developers a single AI API to access video generation, image generation, and LLM APIs. Instead of managing multiple vendor integrations, you connect once and get unified access to 300+ curated models across all modalities.
Check out Atlas Cloud’s new coding plan promotion for more budget-friendly API access: https://www.atlascloud.ai/console/coding-plan
About
Operational tradecraft accumulated across bug-bounty engagements and authorized pentests, codified into Claude skills. Platform-agnostic — slot into any engagement workflow you already use, or none.
Author: ElementalSoul · GenAI Security Research
Sister project: Claude-OSINT — paired skills for the recon phase that this bundle picks up after.
Vendored foundation: shuvonsec/claude-bug-bounty — methodology, validation, reporting, payload library (8 of 71 skills + 15 slash commands)
Generator tool used (not vendored): shuvonsec/public-skills-builder — used to scaffold per-class skills from H1 disclosed reports
Inspirations:
- archangel / douglasday — top-10 H1 hunter; per-class skill pattern
- Trail of Bits —
trailofbits/skills— skill-authoring discipline - SecSkills —
trilwu/secskills— subagent pattern
Tool inventory:
- PortSwigger Burp Suite + MCP Server extension
- ProjectDiscovery — subfinder · dnsx · httpx · katana · nuclei
- SecLists · Assetnote Wordlists
License: MIT — use freely, attribution appreciated.
“Give Claude the right skill and it stops being a chatbot. It becomes an operator.”
相似文章
@wanerfu: 一个日本开发者发现了Claude Code鲜为人知的技巧。 他设置了'找技能'这个技能。它像小MCP包一样嵌入Claude Code。写一次任务说明。Claude搜索人类生态系统中数百个技能,自动组建最适合的工作流。 视频脚本(Notio…
日本开发者发现Claude Code的一个技巧,通过设置'找技能'技能让Claude自动搜索并组合数百个技能来创建工作流,实现自动化视频内容生成。
@ai_suxiaole: 看到一个 Claude Skills 合集: claude-skill 19K 它收录了 170 个生产级技能包,覆盖工程、产品、营销、合规、管理等 9 个领域 每个技能包都包含指令文档、Python 工具脚本和参考资料,可以直接安装使用…
该项目收录了170个生产级Claude技能包,覆盖9个领域,包含指令文档、Python脚本和参考资源,可直接安装使用,支持多种AI编码工具。
@0xMulight: Claude Code终极爬虫手册:5大开源Skill让AI真正会上网干活 想让Claude别再只是聊天工具,而是直接上手抓数据、操作网页、批量处理内容?下面这套组合就是最实用的方案。 我把方案整理成这份手册,可以直接复制给Claude …
本文介绍了5个开源工具(Agent-reach、Scrapling、Browser-use、Claude in Chrome、Web-access),让Claude Code等AI Agent具备网页数据抓取、浏览器操作等能力,从轻量到重量级覆盖不同场景,并提供配置心法。
@max_ai_max: https://x.com/max_ai_max/status/2060221653259547069
本文分享了编写一个真正可用的Claude Skill的实践指南,涵盖运行机制、目录骨架、frontmatter写作、迭代方法等,帮助开发者高效构建和调试自定义技能。
@sitinme: 一个给 Claude Code 装了一套“增强插件包”的开源项目——oh-my-claudecode,把原本单兵作战的 Claude Code,升级成更像一个有分工、有流程、有自动化能力的 AI 开发团队。 很多人用 Claude Cod…
oh-my-claudecode 是一个开源项目,为 Claude Code 提供增强插件包,将其升级为具备任务分工、自动化流程和团队协作能力的 AI 开发团队,适合重度用户和复杂项目。