Speaker-Specific and Language-Dependent Temporal Organization in Bilingual Political Speech
Summary
This study investigates temporal organization in bilingual political speech, revealing that consonant-based timing metrics are speaker-specific while vowel-based metrics are language-dependent, with French exhibiting longer and more variable vowels.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/16/26, 08:44 AM
# Speaker-Specific and Language-Dependent Temporal Organization in Bilingual Political Speech Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16274](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16274) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.16274) > Abstract:Speech rhythm helps structure persuasive speech, but most empirical work examines monolingual English\. This study asks how politicians organize timing when speaking Luxembourgish and French\. We analyze 400 sentences from ten politicians, annotated for segments and pauses\. We compute rhythm metrics, including means, variability, and pairwise variability indices for consonants and vowels\. We quantify speaker and language contributions and test within\-speaker language effects with paired t\-tests\. Results show that consonant\-based metrics retain speaker\-specific signatures, whereas vowel\-based metrics are largely driven by language choice\. French tokens display longer and more variable vowels and vocalic intervals, while consonant timing differences are smaller\. No robust language by gender interactions emerge\. These findings show that language choice systematically reorganizes rhythmic timing in bilingual public speech\. ## Submission history From: Nina Hosseini\-Kivanani \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/c3104d3e/2609.16274)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:57:40 UTC \(7,849 KB\)
Similar Articles
Speaker or Language? Explaining Variance in Charismatic Prosody Across Luxembourgish and French
This study examines charismatic prosody in bilingual political speeches across Luxembourgish and French, finding that speaker identity accounts for most variance while language shows systematic differences in acoustic features.
The Dynamics of Human and AI-Generated Language: How Semantics Fluctuates across Different Timescales
This paper introduces a semantic-timescale analysis pipeline to study how generic vs. specific content is distributed over time in human and AI-generated speech, revealing that autocorrelation-window measures capture temporal organization of semantics beyond static lexical distributions.
Articulatory strategy as a source of variation in acoustic vowel dynamics
This study uses ultrasound tongue imaging data from 36 speakers to show that individual articulatory strategies for producing the palatal vowel /i/ systematically influence acoustic formant dynamics in diphthongs, linking tongue movement patterns to formant transition timing and steepness.
Umm... With Transformers? Insights from Filled Pause Use across Four Slavic Parliaments
Analyzes filled pauses across 4 Slavic parliaments using transformer-based detection, replicating known effects (age, speech rate) and finding novel associations with sentiment, political orientation, and power status.
A Cross-lingual Comparison of Human and Classification Model Entrainment Behavior in Code-switched Speech Settings
This paper presents a cross-lingual analysis of entrainment behavior in Mandarin-English, Hindi-English, and Spanish-English code-switched dialogues, finding that lexical entrainment generalizes but acoustic-prosodic and style entrainment vary. It also evaluates how classification models capture these behaviors, showing they prioritize different features than humans.