Rethinking Token Reweighting for SFT: Suppress, Reverse, and Extrapolate Learned Features

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

This paper proposes SCALE (Selective Control of Adaptation via Local Entropy), an entropy-guided method that freezes the pretrained model and SFT delta while learning bounded token- and module-specific gates to suppress, reverse, or extrapolate learned features during supervised fine-tuning. The approach achieves strong math-reasoning and code-generation results on Qwen2.5-Math and Qwen3-4B-Base models, outperforming existing token-reweighting baselines.

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) learns most aggressively from tokens that the model deems least likely. This helps acquire new behaviors, but also amplifies noisy or conflicting supervision and can overwrite useful pretrained knowledge. Through a unified policy-loss view, we revisit existing token-reweighting methods and show that they assign nonnegative coefficients to demonstrated tokens. Consequently, they can suppress or amplify supervised updates, but cannot reverse harmful features once learned. Moreover, larger training weights do not amount to feature extrapolation, since they change the optimization trajectory rather than scale a fixed SFT direction. We argue that reversal and extrapolation require a stable reference frame defined by a fixed SFT delta. Motivated by this, we propose SCALE (Selective Control of Adaptation via Local Entropy), an entropy-guided adaptation-strength-control method that freezes the pretrained model and the SFT delta and learns bounded token- and module-specific gates by minimizing predictive entropy alone. These gates suppress, reverse, or extrapolate frozen SFT features according to their alignment with entropy reduction. Across Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B, Qwen2.5-Math-7B, and Qwen3-4B-Base, SCALE achieves mathematical-reasoning averages of 37.84, 43.60, and 36.57, exceeding the strongest corresponding baselines while remaining competitive on general-retention benchmarks. It also attains the best average code-generation performance across HumanEval, HumanEval+, and MBPP for all three models. These results suggest that effective SFT correction can benefit from controlling how already learned residuals are used, rather than only modifying how they are learned.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/05/26, 12:47 PM

Paper page - Rethinking Token Reweighting for SFT: Suppress, Reverse, and Extrapolate Learned Features

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2609.33463

Abstract

Supervisedfine-tuning(SFT)learnsmostaggressivelyfromtokensthatthemodeldeemsleastlikely.Thishelpsacquirenewbehaviors,butalsoamplifiesnoisyorconflictingsupervisionandcanoverwriteusefulpretrainedknowledge.Throughaunifiedpolicy-lossview,werevisitexistingtoken-reweightingmethodsandshowthattheyassignnonnegativecoefficientstodemonstratedtokens.Consequently,theycansuppressoramplifysupervisedupdates,butcannotreverseharmfulfeaturesoncelearned.Moreover,largertrainingweightsdonotamounttofeatureextrapolation,sincetheychangetheoptimizationtrajectoryratherthanscaleafixedSFTdirection.WearguethatreversalandextrapolationrequireastablereferenceframedefinedbyafixedSFTdelta.Motivatedbythis,weproposeSCALE(SelectiveControlofAdaptationviaLocalEntropy),anentropy-guidedadaptation-strength-controlmethodthatfreezesthepretrainedmodelandtheSFTdeltaandlearnsboundedtoken-andmodule-specificgatesbyminimizingpredictiveentropyalone.Thesegatessuppress,reverse,orextrapolatefrozenSFTfeaturesaccordingtotheiralignmentwithentropyreduction.AcrossQwen2.5-Math-1.5B,Qwen2.5-Math-7B,andQwen3-4B-Base,SCALEachievesmathematical-reasoningaveragesof37.84,43.60,and36.57,exceedingthestrongestcorrespondingbaselineswhileremainingcompetitiveongeneral-retentionbenchmarks.Italsoattainsthebestaveragecode-generationperformanceacrossHumanEval,HumanEval+,andMBPPforallthreemodels.TheseresultssuggestthateffectiveSFTcorrectioncanbenefitfromcontrollinghowalreadylearnedresidualsareused,ratherthanonlymodifyinghowtheyarelearned.

View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609\.33463

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.33463 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.33463 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.33463 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

@maximelabonne: This is so neat! Dynamic Fine-Tuning (DFT) reweights the SFT loss by the model's own token probability, which creates a…

X AI KOLs Following

Dynamic Fine-Tuning (DFT) is introduced as a method that reweights the SFT loss using the model's own token probability, creating a feedback loop, and adds forward KL to penalize tokens the base model finds likely but the policy has pushed toward zero probability. The tweet expresses skepticism about SFT papers in practice but praises the attempt.