@mattshumer_: Every time a VC sends me an auto-router company to diligence, I send something like this back. If caching wasn't a thin…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

The post critiques auto-routing companies in AI, emphasizing that frequent model switching invalidates prompt caches, resulting in higher token costs and inefficiencies.

Every time a VC sends me an auto-router company to diligence, I send something like this back. If caching wasn't a thing, auto-routing would make much more sense. But... it is a thing.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/26/26, 11:22 AM

Every time a VC sends me an auto-router company to diligence, I send something like this back.

If caching wasn’t a thing, auto-routing would make much more sense.

But… it is a thing.

Teknium 🪽 (@Teknium): Just FYI. If you are switching models in a session all the time - you are doing it wrong.

Every time you switch, your entire prompt cache is invalidated on the new model you switch to, and you have to repay the full input tokens price for all of it.

Stop doing this unless those

Similar Articles

LLM Routing is not the problem to solve; token efficiency is

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The article argues that model routing isn't the real problem to solve—token efficiency is. It advocates for a holistic closed-loop approach combining cheaper defaults, preference-aware routing, and better caching (e.g., Coinbase's 5%→60% cache hit improvement) to maximize useful intelligence per dollar.