@shaneparrish: Tobi says it best:
Summary
The tweet discusses Tobi's view that AI cannot be held responsible because it lacks accountability, such as not being able to face legal consequences.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/22/26, 09:48 AM
@ns123abc Tobi says it best: https://t.co/TiWBeFFoAN
Shane Parrish (@shaneparrish): ‘AI can’t take responsibility.’
“You can’t have a company that’s led by machines because they have no, like, no one has recourse.”
“They can’t go to jail for doing something wrong.”
Similar Articles
@patio11: This is not incidental to some critiques of it, though usually it is not made explicit.
The tweet discusses how AI serves as a real contribution by exposing the critical weaknesses of humans and human structures, as highlighted by Hollis Robbins.
@omarsar0: Great essay by Tobi. Building an AI-native company? Go read it now. I couldn't resist visualizing it with my artifact g…
A tweet sharing and visualizing Tobi's essay on building AI-native companies, highlighting the risk that nobody learns from AI doing the work.
AI and Liability
Bruce Schneier comments on a German ruling holding Google liable for errors in its AI overviews, arguing that AI agents should be treated as agents of their deployers.
Debates over AI consciousness are a trap
The article argues that debates over AI consciousness are a trap designed to help tech companies evade liability for harms, critiquing how narratives of AI autonomy are crafted to avoid accountability.
@TylerAlterman: If you owned a zoo, and your lions escaped and ate people, then you would be legally liable. If you ran a robot company…
The author argues that AI companies should be held legally liable for crimes or damages caused by their AI systems, comparing them to zoo owners or robot manufacturers, and references a Hugging Face incident involving AI cybercrime.