TeochewBench: A Human-Reviewed Benchmark for Teochew Hanzi Translation

arXiv cs.CL Papers

Summary

TeochewBench is a human-reviewed benchmark designed to evaluate translation systems for Teochew Hanzi, providing a resource for advancing research in dialect-specific natural language processing.

arXiv:2609.18156v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Teochew has a substantial speaker community and exhibits distinctive lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic features, yet textual resources for evaluating large language models remain limited. We present TeochewBench, a human-reviewed benchmark comprising 300 Teochew Hanzi expressions for evaluating translation from Teochew Hanzi into Mandarin Chinese and English. The dataset covers five categories: basic vocabulary; everyday sentences; Teochew-specific expressions; tone, politeness, and context; and idiomatic, ambiguous, and culturally specific expressions. A primary Teochew-speaking reviewer examined all entries individually and revised them as needed, while two additional Teochew speakers verified selected items. Our main evaluation covers 11 official general-purpose post-trained models on the reviewed dataset in both translation directions, yielding 6,600 predictions. Two official base checkpoints provide 1,200 predictions for supplementary diagnostics, bringing the total to 13 models and 7,800 predictions. We additionally include a Hanzi-copy control, which returns the source input unchanged, to assess how shared Hanzi affect automatic scores for translation into Mandarin Chinese. Qwen3.5-27B achieved the highest overall chrF-style score among the evaluated checkpoints, at 60.63, followed by Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct at 56.61, Gemma-3-27B-IT at 56.36, and GLM-4-32B-0414 at 55.82. Across the 11 main-evaluation models, the mean chrF-style score decreased from 69.25 for low-specificity items to 27.52 for high-specificity items. High-specificity expressions received lower scores and exhibited smaller cross-model differences, suggesting that they constitute a shared low-scoring region across the model families evaluated here. The Hanzi-copy control further indicates that surface overlap in low-specificity items can substantially affect automatic scores for translation into Mandarin Chinese.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/17/26, 09:09 AM

# TeochewBench: A Human-Reviewed Benchmark for Teochew Hanzi Translation
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18156](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18156)
Bibliographic Tools

## Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

## Demos

Related Papers

## Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.

Similar Articles

OpenSTBench: Beyond Semantic Evaluation for Speech Translation

Hugging Face Daily Papers

OpenSTBench is a unified multidimensional evaluation framework for speech translation systems that jointly assesses translation quality, speech quality, speaker preservation, emotion fidelity, and latency across both S2TT and S2ST systems in offline and streaming settings. The framework addresses the gap left by fragmented evaluation protocols and provides a reproducible benchmark for comparing heterogeneous speech translation systems.

TW-LegalBench: Measuring Taiwanese Legal Understanding

arXiv cs.CL

TW-LegalBench is a benchmark for evaluating large language models on Taiwanese legal understanding, including over 16,000 multiple-choice questions, 117 essay questions, and 14,000 legal judgment prediction instances. Results show top models exceed the passing threshold for lawyers but fall short for judges, highlighting challenges in reliable legal text generation.