Need brutal feedback: I built a recorder for AI agent runs
Summary
A developer built agentproof-recorder to record AI agent runs and detect rule violations, seeking feedback on whether this is a common pain point.
Similar Articles
Looking for feedback on the framework. Cross agent validation
A developer is seeking feedback on an open-source framework for coding agents that catches AI-generated 'slop' before it reaches the repo by having a second agent automatically review every change and send findings back, along with a session manager, ledger, and guards against repeated model mistakes.
Everyone here measures what goes into agent memory. I measured whether the agent actually obeys it. 737 warnings, 0 violations, thresholds written down first.
The author developed an open-source tool called scar-cli to measure whether AI agents actually follow injected rules, reporting 737 rule firings with zero violations in their own repositories and inviting community testing.
I’m building an AI agent that understands the problem before trying to solve it — looking for brutal feedback
The author is building an AI agent that uses diagnostic conversations to understand user problems before offering solutions, and is seeking feedback on its potential applications across various industries.
Posted about the agent debugging spiral yesterday. The replies taught me more than my post did.
A developer reflects on community insights for debugging AI agents, emphasizing systemic reliability through techniques like logging tool calls and structured output validators.
I built an AI support-agent prototype and realized the hard part is not the chatbot it is the handoff and audit trail. Looking for critique from people who run support/CX workflows.
The author built RelayOps, an AI support agent prototype for telecom/subscription support, and shares results from a 50-ticket sample, seeking critique on handoff records, unsafe actions, audit fields, and usefulness for testing.