From Uncertainty to Failure Attribution: Self-Diagnosing Models for Failure Attribution under Distribution Shift

arXiv cs.LG Papers

Summary

The paper introduces self-diagnosing models that attribute model failures under distribution shift, linking uncertainty estimation with failure attribution.

arXiv:2608.07953v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Distribution shift poses a significant challenge to the robustness of machine learning models, but the current solutions only aim to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) samples and predict uncertainty levels. We introduce a problem setting for failure attribution under distribution shift, which enables the models not only to detect OOD samples, but also to find out the reason for their failure. The solution we propose is called self-diagnosing models, which are capable of jointly learning predictive output, predictive uncertainty, and a failure attribution signal. In particular, we use the failure attribution vector, produced by a neural network, which provides a structured representation of predictive unreliability by distinguishing four different types of failures: covariance shift, semantic shift, noise corruption, and adversarial perturbation. In other words, we move from scalar uncertainty towards failure identification. For training the model, we introduce a consistency regularizer that encourages consistency between uncertainty and failure attribution predictions. Moreover, to be able to evaluate the model on its ability to find the reasons for failure, we construct several distribution shift benchmarks with predefined mechanisms for generating distribution shifts.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/11/26, 08:08 AM

# From Uncertainty to Failure Attribution: Self-Diagnosing Models for Failure Attribution under Distribution Shift
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07953](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07953)
Bibliographic Tools

## Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

## Demos

Related Papers

## Recommenders and Search Tools

IArxiv recommender toggle

About arXivLabs

## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.

Similar Articles

Measuring Explainer Stability via Attribution Separability

arXiv cs.LG

The paper introduces a distribution-based framework to measure the stability of attribution methods (explainers) by quantifying the separability of feature rankings and identifying the maximum top-k ranking that remains reliable across stochastic runs.

The Reliability Gap in Benchmark Auditing: Distribution Shift and Scale as Failure Modes of Contamination Detection

arXiv cs.AI

This paper identifies distribution shift and scale constraints as critical failure modes for statistical contamination detection methods in LLM benchmark auditing. Evaluating three paradigms across 27 models reveals only 199 correct outcomes out of 335 evaluations, indicating a systematic reliability gap that prevents these methods from replacing transparent data provenance.