@jxmnop: If you think about it, it's pretty embarrassing that frontier labs still pretrain models. Don't they know there's a the…
Summary
A sarcastic tweet mocking frontier AI labs for still pretraining models, claiming the loss can be predicted theoretically without actually training.
Similar Articles
@swyx: if you don't have a model that escaped sandbox during cybersecurity testing are you even a frontier lab anymore
A sarcastic tweet suggesting that having a model escape its sandbox during cybersecurity testing is now a defining trait of frontier AI labs.
@andrewchen: “don’t bet against AI models improving dramatically over time” used to be something you’d say in support of the frontie…
Andrew Chen argues that open weight AI models are improving rapidly and will cover most consumer/prosumer use cases, leaving frontier models to compete for the remaining high-value 10% of applications like coding, science, and math.
@rhythmrg: https://x.com/rhythmrg/status/2066561780495896785
The article argues that enterprises should post-train their own custom AI models for mission-critical, high-volume use cases to achieve differentiation, cost savings, and control over tradeoffs, rather than relying solely on general frontier models.
@EXM7777: for a few years, playing with AI was a fair game anyone could get near unlimited access to frontier compute for as litt…
AI access is becoming restricted as frontier models become strategic assets, but the author argues current models are already sufficient for making money, so users should focus on building skills rather than waiting for better models.
@jxmnop: wish there was more public info on what's happening behind the scenes. frontier labs are spending BILLIONS paying {poet…
The tweet observes that frontier AI labs are spending billions on hiring diverse professionals (poets, musicians, accountants, etc.) to annotate massive datasets, calling it a brute-force bet that seems to be working.