Should I Commit and Publish the Results? [R]
Summary
A researcher describes building a deep learning model with 270k parameters to predict melting points from topological indices, achieving R² 0.6399, and asks whether to publish the results.
Similar Articles
Does submitting to only journals negatively affect research career after finishing PhD? [D]
A PhD graduate asks whether publishing exclusively in peer-reviewed journals (TMLR, JMLR, Neurocomputing) instead of top ML conferences (NeurIPS, ICML) would negatively impact their chances of landing industry research scientist positions.
Looking for arXiv endorsement + sharing a preprint on homeostatic cognitive architecture for AI companions [R]
A preprint on SSRN presents PHI // DRIFT, a cognitive middleware architecture for AI companions with persistent internal state and salience-weighted memory retrieval, claiming 14.8% more context per prompt versus cosine-only RAG on consumer hardware.
Interpretable machine learning for predicting splitting strength of asphalt concrete: insights from SHAP analysis
An arXiv paper presents an interpretable machine-learning framework for predicting the splitting strength of asphalt concrete using SHAP analysis, comparing six models with TabPFN performing best.
Experiments or Outcomes? Probing Scientific Feasibility in Large Language Models
UMBC researchers show LLMs judge scientific claim feasibility better when given outcome data than experiment descriptions, and that incomplete experimental context can hurt accuracy.
@NielsRogge: That's right, a 3.9GB file getting 99.2% on Math 500 A dataset once introduced by @OpenAI in the paper "Let's verify st…
PrismML's Bonsai-27B model achieves 99.2% on the Math 500 dataset, outperforming DeepSeek-R1 and Kimi K2.