Should I Commit and Publish the Results? [R]
Summary
A researcher describes building a deep learning model with 270k parameters to predict melting points from topological indices, achieving R² 0.6399, and asks whether to publish the results.
Similar Articles
Does submitting to only journals negatively affect research career after finishing PhD? [D]
A PhD graduate asks whether publishing exclusively in peer-reviewed journals (TMLR, JMLR, Neurocomputing) instead of top ML conferences (NeurIPS, ICML) would negatively impact their chances of landing industry research scientist positions.
Looking for arXiv endorsement + sharing a preprint on homeostatic cognitive architecture for AI companions [R]
A preprint on SSRN presents PHI // DRIFT, a cognitive middleware architecture for AI companions with persistent internal state and salience-weighted memory retrieval, claiming 14.8% more context per prompt versus cosine-only RAG on consumer hardware.
Interpretable machine learning for predicting splitting strength of asphalt concrete: insights from SHAP analysis
An arXiv paper presents an interpretable machine-learning framework for predicting the splitting strength of asphalt concrete using SHAP analysis, comparing six models with TabPFN performing best.
Where to submit stat/prob ML [D]
A researcher in statistical and probabilistic ML discusses the overwhelming presence of LLM-based works in top conferences like ICLR and NeurIPS, and explores alternative venues such as AISTATS and UAI for publishing such research.
Experiments or Outcomes? Probing Scientific Feasibility in Large Language Models
UMBC researchers show LLMs judge scientific claim feasibility better when given outcome data than experiment descriptions, and that incomplete experimental context can hurt accuracy.