Fraudster jailed for using 10K bots and AI songs to outstream Taylor Swift

# Fraudster jailed for using 10K bots and AI songs to outstream Taylor Swift Source: [https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/10/outstreaming-taylor-swift-is-easy-with-10k-bots-and-ai-songs-fraudster-admits/](https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/10/outstreaming-taylor-swift-is-easy-with-10k-bots-and-ai-songs-fraudster-admits/) Smith’s streaming fraud didn’t just hurt platforms but genuine artists who share royalty pools on streaming services, the DOJ claimed\. By cutting into that pool, Smith reduced royalties across the board\. Therefore, on top of serving 18 months in prison, he must forfeit the $8,091,843\.64 that he claimed through his AI scheme, the court ruled\. For Smith, the outcome likely feels outsized, as a[letter](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.627522/gov.uscourts.nysd.627522.62.0.pdf)from his lawyers prior to sentencing urged the court that the DOJ should not be punishing one man for the “ills of an industry\.” Since this is the DOJ’s first prosecution of this kind, Smith’s legal team suggested officials were making an example of Smith, while knowing that he did not actually pocket $8 million\. Instead of jail time, Smith fought for a probation sentence,[noting](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.627522/gov.uscourts.nysd.627522.57.0.pdf)that he was “profoundly sorry\.” He further explained that he’d been offered a job that paid $5,000 per month to do “audio production, mixing, mastering, and recording for a record label\.” By requiring jail time, the DOJ would only serve to delay Smith’s ability to pay back the forfeiture, his lawyers suggested\. The DOJ disagreed, though,[telling](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.627522/gov.uscourts.nysd.627522.60.0.pdf)the court that Smith engaged in increasingly deceptive tactics to sustain his artificial streaming, lied to cops when confronted, and needed a stronger sentence for deterrence\. “For years, Smith orchestrated a sophisticated fraudulent scheme that stole millions of dollars in musical royalties from rights holders,” the DOJ said\. “The Court should impose a sentence that adequately punishes the defendant for his fraud scheme and sends a message to others that streaming fraud will be met with significant punishment\.”