Ground system issue scrubs first launch of SpaceX's Starship V3 rocket

Ars Technica News

Summary

SpaceX's first launch of the taller, more powerful Starship V3 rocket was scrubbed due to a hydraulic pin issue on the launch tower, with a possible attempt the next day.

<p>SpaceX got within 40 seconds of launching the first flight of a taller, more powerful version of its Starship rocket Thursday, but a pesky problem with the launch tower kept the vehicle bound to Earth for at least one more day.</p> <p>Clouds and rain showers cleared the area around SpaceX's launch site in South Texas, leaving mostly sunny skies over the Starship launch pad Thursday afternoon. SpaceX pushed back the launch time by one hour, but the countdown appeared to proceed smoothly once propellants began loading into the rocket.</p> <p>That was true, at least, until the countdown clock paused 40 seconds before liftoff. The launch team repeatedly attempted to resume the countdown, only for the computer controlling the launch sequence to stop the clock again. There were five holds in all before SpaceX called off the launch attempt.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/05/ground-system-issue-scrubs-first-launch-of-spacexs-starship-v3-rocket/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/05/ground-system-issue-scrubs-first-launch-of-spacexs-starship-v3-rocket/#comments">Comments</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/22/26, 06:46 AM

# Ground system issue scrubs first launch of SpaceX's Starship V3 rocket Source: [https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/05/ground-system-issue-scrubs-first-launch-of-spacexs-starship-v3-rocket/](https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/05/ground-system-issue-scrubs-first-launch-of-spacexs-starship-v3-rocket/) SpaceX got within 40 seconds of launching the first flight of a taller, more powerful version of its Starship rocket Thursday, but a pesky problem with the launch tower kept the vehicle bound to Earth for at least one more day\. Clouds and rain showers cleared the area around SpaceX’s launch site in South Texas, leaving mostly sunny skies over the Starship launch pad Thursday afternoon\. SpaceX pushed back the launch time by one hour, but the countdown appeared to proceed smoothly once propellants began loading into the rocket\. That was true, at least, until the countdown clock paused 40 seconds before liftoff\. The launch team repeatedly attempted to resume the countdown, only for the computer controlling the launch sequence to stop the clock again\. There were five holds in all before SpaceX called off the launch attempt\. “It is sounding like we are not going to be able to clear this issue in time today, so we are going to be standing down from a launch,” said Dan Huot, a SpaceX official hosting the company’s live broadcast Thursday\. “We got the vehicle totally loaded\. We hit a couple of different holds as we worked through that count\.” Elon Musk, SpaceX’s founder and CEO, attributed the scrub to a hydraulic pin that failed to retract on an umbilical arm connecting the launch tower to the rocket\. “If that can be fixed tonight, there will be another launch attempt tomorrow,” Musk wrote on X\. The 90\-minute launch window Friday would open at 5:30 pm CDT \(22:30 UTC\)\. The upcoming Starship test flight will mark the first liftoff from a brand new launch pad at Starbase, Texas, the one\-year\-old city encompassing SpaceX’s South Texas test site near the US\-Mexico border\. It will be the 12th full\-scale test flight of Starship and its Super Heavy booster to date, and the first to employ an overhauled design SpaceX calls Starship Version 3\. Starship V3 introduces numerous changes, including 39 more efficient, higher\-thrust Raptor engines, a redesigned propulsion system, three larger grid fins to replace four smaller ones, and a reusable hot staging ring permanently attached to the top of the Super Heavy booster\.

Similar Articles

Google will pay SpaceX $920M per month for compute

TechCrunch AI

Google will pay SpaceX $920 million per month from October 2026 through June 2029 for access to approximately 110,000 NVIDIA GPUs and other components, in a deal similar to SpaceX's recent agreement with Anthropic.

@TaoRay: Bo Bo, you are a person of great wisdom! I said months ago that X allows so many scam posts just to pump up performance for SpaceX's IPO. Many brainless fans don't even look at the prospectus or roadshow. So Musk needs these retail investors because the numbers can't withstand close scrutiny. The stars-and-seas ideal is great, but performance must include the dimension of time. The biggest support for the current valuation is...

X AI KOLs Following

User criticizes Musk for counting X's Blue subscription fees into xAI's revenue, and predicts that SpaceX's IPO may open high and then decline.

@TaoRay: The only truly profitable business for SpaceX is satellite communications, and there's still room for growth in that area. But what's the profit point in colonizing Mars? It could only be some government contracts, and they won't even get orders from China. In my view, this is a money-burning project driven by a dream. Are there resources to mine on Mars? How does it make money? How does it turn into shareholder value? Btw, humans…

X AI KOLs Following

This post questions the profitability of SpaceX's Mars colonization, arguing that only satellite communications is profitable and that the Mars project is a money-burning dream, concluding that humans cannot become a multi-planetary species.