@TheGeorgePu: I'm trying out DeepSeek V4 Pro, and really like it. Super underrated model. As good as Opus 4.8 from the few tests I ra…
Summary
User @TheGeorgePu praises DeepSeek V4 Pro, calling it underrated and comparing it favorably to Opus 4.8 based on initial tests.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/17/26, 04:01 PM
I’m trying out DeepSeek V4 Pro, and really like it.
Super underrated model.
As good as Opus 4.8 from the few tests I ran.
Similar Articles
We Tested DeepSeek V4 Pro and Flash Against Claude Opus 4.7 and Kimi K2.6 (11 minute read)
DeepSeek released V4 Pro and V4 Flash under MIT license on April 24, 2026. In benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.7 and Kimi K2.6, V4 Pro scored 77/100 at $2.25, placing between Opus 4.7 (91) and Kimi K2.6 (68), while V4 Flash scored 60/100 at $0.02, the cheapest in the comparison, with a 75% discount on V4 Pro through May 31.
@Lonely__MH: Announcing something: DeepSeek v4 is the undisputed god of Chinese writing! Personally tested Opus 4.8 and DeepSeek-v4-pro head-to-head. Result: Opus 4.8 got completely crushed. This proves that for Chinese writing, you've got to go with the homegrown champion! Paying respects to Master Liang
A personal test claims DeepSeek v4 surpasses Opus 4.8 in Chinese writing, asserting that DeepSeek v4 is currently the strongest model for Chinese writing.
@datacurve: Opus 4.8 is now on DeepSWE. On the default high thinking effort, it scores 6% higher than Opus 4.7 xhigh, while also lo…
Opus 4.8 is now available on DeepSWE, scoring 6% higher than Opus 4.7 with reduced average cost per task.
I have (even faster) DeepSeek V4 Pro at home
A user reports successfully running the DeepSeek V4 Pro model locally using ktransformers and sharing detailed benchmark results across various context depths, demonstrating improved inference speeds.
DeepSeek V4 Pro beats GPT-5.5 Pro on precision
DeepSeek V4 Pro reportedly outperforms GPT-5.5 Pro on precision, suggesting a significant advancement in model accuracy.