Foundational Study on Authorship Attribution of Japanese Web Reviews for Actor Analysis
Summary
A foundational study on applying stylometric authorship attribution to threat intelligence, using Japanese Rakuten reviews to compare TF-IDF+LR, BERT embedding, BERT fine-tuning, and metric learning methods. BERT-FT performed best overall, but TF-IDF+LR proved more stable and efficient when scaling to hundreds of authors.
Similar Articles
Fusing Stylometric and Embedding Systems to Estimate Authorship Likelihood Ratios in Japanese
This paper applies the likelihood ratio framework for forensic authorship attribution to Japanese texts, fusing stylometric features with embedding-based systems to improve discrimination and calibration.
Using Text-Based Causal Inference to Disentangle Factors Influencing Online Review Ratings
This paper introduces a text-based causal inference methodology using an enhanced CausalBERT to disentangle the effects of individual aspects (e.g., school administration, academic performance) on overall online review ratings, validated on 600K+ U.S. K-12 school reviews. Key improvements include temperature scaling, hyperparameter optimization, and interpretability methods to reduce confounding bias.
From TF-IDF to Transformers: A Comparative and Ensemble Approach to Sentiment Classification
This paper compares multiple machine learning and transformer models for sentiment classification on movie reviews, finding RoBERTa achieves 93.02% accuracy, and a soft voting ensemble improves performance.
READER: Robust Evidence-based Authorship Decoding via Extracted Representations
Introduces READER, a lightweight framework for dynamic black-box LLM provenance that uses a frozen proxy LLM to extract authorship evidence from responses and performs Bayesian evidence accumulation across multiple queries, achieving high accuracy on the Agent500 dataset.
LLM Attribution Analysis Across Different Fine-Tuning Strategies and Model Scales for Automated Code Compliance
This paper analyzes how different fine-tuning strategies (FFT, LoRA, quantized LoRA) and model scales affect LLM interpretive behavior for automated code compliance tasks using perturbation-based attribution analysis. The findings show FFT produces more focused attribution patterns than parameter-efficient methods, and larger models develop specific interpretive strategies with diminishing performance returns beyond 7B parameters.