I measured what was actually in my agent's context: 84% of the command output was noise nobody reads
Summary
The author measured that 84% of command output in coding agents is unnecessary noise, and shares key principles for filtering it effectively to improve efficiency, such as filtering at execution time and ensuring accurate attribution.
Similar Articles
I deleted 71% of my agent instruction files across 6 repos. Here's what was actually in the pile.
A developer shares their audit of Claude Code agent instruction files, removing 71% of them and categorizing the bloat, offering a rubric for deciding what to keep and a script to measure instruction footprint.
I measured where my AI coding agents waste tokens, 42% was avoidable. Built a tool to catch it (Claude Code / Cursor / Codex)
The author measured token waste in AI coding agents and found 42% avoidable, then built a tool to catch it. The tool works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex.
@kentcdodds: Claude Code cut about 80% of its system prompt for newer models. A research paper evaluating AGENTS.md found those file…
Kent C. Dodds discusses a research paper showing AGENTS.md often doesn't improve task success while adding over 20% inference cost, and asks what should actually be placed in AGENTS.md, noting Claude Code reduced its system prompt by 80%.
Tested whether my coding CLI actually reads AGENTS.md.
An experiment testing whether a coding CLI actually reads AGENTS.md found the file was silently ignored, and even when read, bloated instruction files increased token costs and failed to improve performance. The author recommends writing only what the model cannot infer from code.
@yibie: Recommends this hardcore real-world test. An engineer tracked his coding agent session for a week and found that only 0.67% of tokens were spent on actual tasks—the remaining 99% all went to moving tool directories, skill descriptions, and system prompts. Work-to-overhead ratio 1:1…
An engineer tracked his coding agent's token usage over a week, finding that only 0.67% of tokens were spent on actual tasks, with 99% consumed by tool directories, skill descriptions, and system prompts. He provides optimization strategies, including shell output filtering which saved 46.9% of tokens.