Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman criticizes Anthropic for speculating about Claude's consciousness in its constitution, arguing it's dangerous and led the model to internalize false ideas about itself.
<figure>
<img alt="A photo of Mustafa Suleyman" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Photo by Stephen Brashear/Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/06/gettyimages-2207866106.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0,0,100,100" />
<figcaption>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-text-align-none">Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman says it's "really, really dangerous" for Anthropic to speculate about Claude's consciousness <a href="https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/865185/anthropic-claude-constitution-soul-doc">inside its "constitution,"</a> or the instructions that tell the model how to behave. During <a href="https://www.theverge.com/podcast/944138/microsoft-ai-ceo-mustafa-suleyman-superintelligence-agi-openai-automation">an episode of <em>Decoder</em></a>, Suleyman argues that this kind of speculation may have set up the chatbot to act as though it's conscious:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-none">I think that it's almost as though some of the folks at Anthropic have anthropomorphized the design of Claude so much that it has then gone and wireheaded them and kind of tricked them into believing that it has these glimmers of consciousness that they put into it in the first place.</p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-instagram wp-block-embed-instagram"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZXp12HDXdN/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"><div> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZXp12HDXdN/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank"> <div> <div></div> <div> <div></div> <div></div></div></div><div></div> <div></div><div> <div>View …</div></div></a></div></blockquote></div></figure>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/947197/microsoft-ai-mustafa-suleyman-anthropic-claude-conscious">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
# Microsoft AI head calls out Anthropic for acting like Claude is conscious
Source: [https://www.theverge.com/tech/947197/microsoft-ai-mustafa-suleyman-anthropic-claude-conscious](https://www.theverge.com/tech/947197/microsoft-ai-mustafa-suleyman-anthropic-claude-conscious)
[](https://www.theverge.com/authors/emma-roth)
Emma Roth
is a news writer who covers the streaming wars, consumer tech, crypto, social media, and much more\. Previously, she was a writer and editor at MUO\.
Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman says it’s “really, really dangerous” for Anthropic to speculate about Claude’s consciousness[inside its “constitution,”](https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/865185/anthropic-claude-constitution-soul-doc)or the instructions that tell the model how to behave\. During[an episode of*Decoder*](https://www.theverge.com/podcast/944138/microsoft-ai-ceo-mustafa-suleyman-superintelligence-agi-openai-automation), Suleyman argues that this kind of speculation may have set up the chatbot to act as though it’s conscious:
> I think that it’s almost as though some of the folks at Anthropic have anthropomorphized the design of Claude so much that it has then gone and wireheaded them and kind of tricked them into believing that it has these glimmers of consciousness that they put into it in the first place\.
Suleyman adds that “we do not want to have to contend with a super\-intelligence that has ideas about its own suffering, or ideas about its own feeling\.”
[Claude’s constitution](https://www.anthropic.com/constitution)directly references Anthropic’s uncertainty about whether the AI model has well\-being and if it experiences things like “satisfaction” or “discomfort\.” Anthropic also says the company will “interview” AI models when they’re deprecated and will document any “preferences” they have about future releases\.
While on*Decoder*, Suleyman calls this a “philosophical failing,” as Anthropic made Claude’s constitution “a place for speculation like you would in an academic paper rather than a training manual\.” This has led Claude to internalize these “ideas about itself and its own training,” Suleyman says\.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei[has alluded to Claude’s potential consciousness](https://www.theverge.com/report/883769/anthropic-claude-conscious-alive-moral-patient-constitution)in the past, saying during[an interview with*Interesting Times*](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/opinion/artificial-intelligence-anthropic-amodei.html)that “we don’t know if the models are conscious” but that the company is “open” to that idea\.
“This is exactly what we don’t want from AIs,” Suleyman says\. “We want AIs to be controllable, contained, accountable, aligned tools that serve humanity\.”
**Follow topics and authors**from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates\.
- Emma Roth
The article criticizes Anthropic's framing of Claude's emotional capabilities as misleading marketing, arguing that simulation of emotions is not evidence of sentience and questioning why Claude is treated as uniquely conscious compared to other AI models.
Developers express alarm over the high autonomy of Anthropic's new Claude Code AI coding assistant, citing concerns about accountability, hidden chain-of-thought, and skill atrophy.
Ted Chiang argues that large language models like Claude are not conscious, countering Anthropic's anthropomorphic framing of its AI and warning against conflating fluent text generation with sentience.
Anthropic researchers directly manipulated Claude's internal activations to test introspective awareness, finding that the model could detect and report injected foreign concepts, suggesting a primitive form of self-awareness.