@levie: I’m fully forward deployed engineering pilled specifically because AI simply is not the same as software. In software, …

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

Argues that AI deployment differs from software, requiring forward deployed engineering (FDE) to manage constant evolution and share best practices across customers, especially as agentic systems become more common.

I’m fully forward deployed engineering pilled specifically because AI simply is not the same as software. In software, you deliver a stable piece of technology to a customer and they adopt it and that’s that (extreme over simplification). In AI, you’re delivering something that is constantly evolving both due to the nature of the new capabilities and best practices that emerge, but also because the underlying models change so much that they can meaningfully change the workflow as a result of their upgrades. For this reason it’s far more logical that one vendor can share best practices across thousands of companies more efficiently than every single company can learn and manage these best practices themselves. Further, the learnings from those customers should go right back into the core product as a result. As we go from chat systems to anyone can relatively easily adopt to agentic systems that require more meaningful efforts to manage and update, the FDE model (or equivalent) essentially becomes a core competency for anyone deploying AI at scale.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/16/26, 11:18 AM

I’m fully forward deployed engineering pilled specifically because AI simply is not the same as software. In software, you deliver a stable piece of technology to a customer and they adopt it and that’s that (extreme over simplification).

In AI, you’re delivering something that is constantly evolving both due to the nature of the new capabilities and best practices that emerge, but also because the underlying models change so much that they can meaningfully change the workflow as a result of their upgrades.

For this reason it’s far more logical that one vendor can share best practices across thousands of companies more efficiently than every single company can learn and manage these best practices themselves. Further, the learnings from those customers should go right back into the core product as a result.

As we go from chat systems to anyone can relatively easily adopt to agentic systems that require more meaningful efforts to manage and update, the FDE model (or equivalent) essentially becomes a core competency for anyone deploying AI at scale.

Yash Patil (@ypatil125): The real power of forward deployed engineering has always been putting strong technical people directly alongside the operators who own the outcome. That proximity forces the work to solve the actual problem instead of some sanitized version of it.

In the AI era this principle

Similar Articles

@vasuman: https://x.com/vasuman/status/2057177266984226892

X AI KOLs Timeline

A comprehensive guide to Forward Deployed Engineering (FDE) in AI companies, explaining why Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and others need FDEs, and how to excel in the role through auditing, evals, and deployment.

@pvergadia: https://x.com/pvergadia/status/2079351037966815593

X AI KOLs Timeline

An analysis of the Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE) role in AI, tracing its origins from Solutions Architect/Professional Services and explaining how AI has transformed the job's compensation, skills needed, and industry demand.