Self-Guided Test-Time Training for Long-Context LLMs
Summary
Proposes Self-Guided Test-Time Training (S-TTT), where the model identifies relevant evidence spans in long contexts for adaptation, achieving up to 15% relative improvement on long-context reasoning benchmarks.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/13/26, 07:50 AM
Paper page - Self-Guided Test-Time Training for Long-Context LLMs
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2607.09415 Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Long-contextprocessinghasbecomeincreasinglyimportantforlargelanguagemodels(LLMs),butsimplyextendingthecontextwindowdoesnotguaranteeeffectiveutilizationoflonginputs.Asinputlengthgrows,accuracyoftendegrades,indicatingthatmodelsstillstruggletoidentifyandusetheevidencemostrelevanttoaquestion.Apromisingwaytoimprovelong-contextutilizationistest-timetraining(TTT),whichtreatsthetestcontextasatrainingexampleforinstance-specificparameteradaptation.However,applyingTTTtotheentirelongcontextisprohibitivelyexpensive,whileadaptingonrandomlysampledspansintroducesseverenoise.Becausemostspansinalongcontextareirrelevanttothespecificquestion,trainingonthemmayevendegradethebasemodel’sperformance.OurpreliminarystudyshowsthatTTTishighlysensitivetotraining-spanquality:onLongBench-v2,TTTonrandomlysampledspanshurtsperformance,whereasTTTonoraclespanssubstantiallyimprovesit.Motivatedbythis,weproposeasimplemethod,Self-GuidedTTT(S-TTT):beforeadaptation,themodelidentifiestheevidencespansitshouldlearnfrom,andthestandardlanguage-modelingtrainingobjectiveisappliedonlytothoseselectedspans.Ontwochallenginglong-contextreasoningbenchmarks,LongBench-v2andLongBench-Pro,S-TTTimprovesaccuracyforbothQwen3-4B-Thinking-2507andLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct,achievinguptoa15%relativeimprovement.
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607\.09415
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.09415 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.09415 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.09415 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
EASE-TTT: Evidence-Aligned Selective Test-Time Training for Long-Context Question Answering
Proposes EASE-TTT, a test-time training framework that aligns adaptation with retrieved evidence to improve long-context QA performance in smaller language models.
Training-Inference Consistent Segmented Execution for Long-Context LLMs
This paper proposes a training-inference consistent segmented execution framework for long-context LLMs to address the mismatch between full-context training and restricted inference regimes, achieving comparable performance with significantly reduced memory usage.
LLMs Improving LLMs: Agentic Discovery for Test-Time Scaling
This paper introduces AutoTTS, an environment-driven framework that automates the discovery of test-time scaling strategies for LLMs by formulating it as controller synthesis. It demonstrates improved accuracy-cost tradeoffs on mathematical reasoning benchmarks with minimal computational overhead.
Modular TTT: Rethinking Test-Time Training as Composable Modules
This paper introduces Modular TTT, a framework that represents test-time training inner learners as directed acyclic graphs, enabling systematic ablation and composition of components. The authors train 410M and 1.45B parameter models on 100B tokens, achieving performance comparable to GatedDeltaNet.
Positional Failures in Long-Context LLMs: A Blind Spot in Reasoning Benchmarks
This paper identifies a blind spot in long-context LLM reasoning benchmarks: they fail to control task position within the context, allowing positional failures to go undetected. The authors propose Context Rot Evaluation (CRE) to systematically vary task position, filler content, and context length, revealing severe accuracy drops for some models when reasoning tasks are placed in the middle of long contexts.