Best attempts at making an agent deterministic as possible.
Summary
The article discusses various techniques to make LLM-powered agents more deterministic, such as golden sets, guardrails, consensus mechanisms, regression tests, coded logic, and hyperparameter tuning, and asks for additional successful methods.
Similar Articles
The most reliable data agent I've shipped is ~90% deterministic code. The LLM just parses intent and talks. Change my mind.
The author argues that the reliability of AI agents comes from deterministic code, not the LLM, and shares five key practices for building trustworthy agents on messy real-world data.
@jianxliao: How do we make agents deterministic?
A tweet by @jianxliao raises the question of how to make AI agents deterministic, sparking discussion on reliability and safety.
How do you actually test an agent harness when half of it is non-deterministic?
A discussion on the challenges of testing AI agent harnesses with non-deterministic components, exploring approaches like golden output diffing and using an LLM as a judge, while questioning the validity of such methods.
LLM-as-a-Judge Is Not an Oracle: Why Self-Improving Agents Need Deterministic Guardrails
This paper identifies failure modes in LLM-as-a-Judge systems for self-improving agents and introduces PROCTOR, an architecture with deterministic guardrails to mitigate these issues.
Is current most of the agent/multi agents solution are deterministic, predictable, is anyone accept this or not what you find in those agents (llm) creative
Discusses the current trend in enterprise AI agent solutions favoring deterministic, auditable behavior over creative, dynamic LLM reasoning, questioning whether any creative agentic solutions exist.