Counterfactual Model Testing Under Distribution Shift

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

提出在分布漂移下进行在线模型测试的方法学,通过区分人口变化与数据完整性问题两种漂移机制,在受控基线上复现漂移以估计模型当前性能,并评估修复数据完整性问题的潜在收益。

arXiv:2610.33594v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deployed machine learning (ML) models can degrade as the distribution of their input data shifts. Such shifts can result from changes in the population or from data integrity issues in the pipeline that materializes model features, two sources that operate through different mechanisms. Because labels are often absent or delayed, it is common practice to track shifts in the data instead, but a detected shift does not indicate how it affects the model. We formulate this problem as online model testing under distribution shift. Testing requires reproducing the shift on a controlled baseline with known labels. Since the same shift can come from either source, doing so requires knowing which mechanism changed. We propose a methodology that reproduces observed changes in both mechanisms to estimate current performance and the potential gain from repairing observed data integrity issues. Experiments on real-world datasets with simulated faults show that separating the two sources generally improves both estimates, supporting this formulation. A churn prediction case illustrates how these tests can support monitoring and repair prioritization
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/28/26, 02:02 AM

# Counterfactual Model Testing Under Distribution Shift
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33594](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33594)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.33594)

> Abstract:Deployed machine learning \(ML\) models can degrade as the distribution of their input data shifts\. Such shifts can result from changes in the population or from data integrity issues in the pipeline that materializes model features, two sources that operate through different mechanisms\. Because labels are often absent or delayed, it is common practice to track shifts in the data instead, but a detected shift does not indicate how it affects the model\. We formulate this problem as online model testing under distribution shift\. Testing requires reproducing the shift on a controlled baseline with known labels\. Since the same shift can come from either source, doing so requires knowing which mechanism changed\. We propose a methodology that reproduces observed changes in both mechanisms to estimate current performance and the potential gain from repairing observed data integrity issues\. Experiments on real\-world datasets with simulated faults show that separating the two sources generally improves both estimates, supporting this formulation\. A churn prediction case illustrates how these tests can support monitoring and repair prioritization

## Submission history

From: Joran Leest \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/a39fcd6c/2610.33594)\] **\[v1\]**Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:42:31 UTC \(59 KB\)

Similar Articles

Correction Training for Diffusion Models

arXiv cs.AI

论文提出一种针对扩散模型的“修正训练”框架,通过训练一个以基模型自身预测为输入的修正器来缩小训练-推理差距,显著提升无引导/无条件生成的样本质量,并可通过蒸馏将收益无损保留到基模型中。

Correction Training for Diffusion Models

Hugging Face Daily Papers

这篇论文提出了一种用于扩散模型的校正训练方法,通过训练一个校正模块来细化去噪预测、减少暴露偏差,从而在无引导条件下显著提升样本质量,并可通过蒸馏将改进效果折算回基础模型以消除额外推理开销。