@yetone: Two aspects of developing Agents that I find very exciting recently: 1. How to solve collaboration between multiple Agents 2. How to solve the identity subject attribution problem for Personified Agents
Summary
The developer shared two exciting research directions when developing Agents: multi-Agent collaboration and the identity subject attribution problem for personified Agents.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/22/26, 08:05 AM
Two aspects of developing Agents that I find very exciting recently:
- How to solve the problem of collaboration between multiple Agents
- How to solve the identity subject attribution problem of Personified Agents
Similar Articles
@Saccc_c: Inspired by the legendary Karpathy’s HackerTube, I built a website called “AnliBili” that brings together high-quality Bilibili videos repeatedly recommended on social media over the past 16 years, helping you cut through the noise! By organizing and categorizing nearly 10 million discussions on Zhihu and Xiaohongshu spanning 16 years, I selected 1,132…
Inspired by Karpathy’s HackerTube, the author used Teamily AI’s multi-agent workflow to build “AnliBili,” a website that curates 1,132 high-quality Bilibili videos repeatedly recommended across nearly 10 million discussions spanning 16 years on Zhihu and Xiaohongshu, helping users cut through information noise.
Show HN: Bema: Work messaging built for humans
Bema is a new work messaging platform built by founder Ben to address clutter in existing tools, emphasizing asynchronous communication with an optional urgent 'break glass' channel.
Al/Data engineers, how would OpenAl setup the "10,000 Agents" that "solved" the Navier-Stokes millennium problem
A discussion questioning how OpenAI would have orchestrated 10,000 agents to 'solve' the Navier-Stokes millennium problem, raising doubts about whether the result was independently achieved or built on prior human progress.
@interjc: Over the past few days, I used my own subagent-team skill to lead an "AI team" in development — burning through the weekly quotas of several Claude/Codex/Gemini accounts plus hundreds of dollars in API costs on a major overhaul of a monorepo project. I pulled out all the delegation records and did a retrospective:
The author shares a retrospective of using their own subagent-team skill to lead a Claude/Codex/etc. AI team through a major monorepo overhaul: cross-vendor model reviews offer the best ROI, rework volume depends on task risk rather than model tier, and they summarize a division of labor where low-tier models act as coordinators, strong models handle risky implementation, and top-tier models handle reviews.
@TONYPAN91241629: Looking for compute sponsors I’m a self-funded student at UIUC building Loxeon, a runtime for self-organizing AI agent …
A UIUC student is seeking compute sponsors for Loxeon, an Apache-2.0-to-be runtime where AI agent teams self-organize via formally specified primitives (identity, capability delegation, role rebinding, tree-based management, and epoch/ticket message validation), written in Rust and checked against a formal spec. The goal is to fairly benchmark whether multi-agent teams outperform single agents on real coding tasks (~$200 small / $1,500 full), with code, logs and results to be published regardless of outcome.