@EMostaque: So @deepseek_ai v4.1 Flash I estimate cost $10m to train, 100x less than GPT-6 Astra. It also costs 100x less to run an…

X AI KOLs Following Models

Summary

A tweet estimates that DeepSeek AI's v4.1 Flash model cost $10 million to train, 100 times less than GPT-6 Astra, with lower running costs and similar benchmark performance, prompting questions about the bull case for frontier AI labs.

So @deepseek_ai v4.1 Flash I estimate cost $10m to train, 100x less than GPT-6 Astra. It also costs 100x less to run and scores about the same on everyday design and other benchmarks What's the bull case for the frontier AI labs once the open source models are competent enough https://t.co/0qi59qioI4
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/16/26, 09:58 AM

So @deepseek_ai v4.1 Flash I estimate cost $10m to train, 100x less than GPT-6 Astra.

It also costs 100x less to run and scores about the same on everyday design and other benchmarks

What’s the bull case for the frontier AI labs once the open source models are competent enough https://t.co/0qi59qioI4

Similar Articles

A cheaper AI model is not necessarily cheaper once retries are counted

Reddit r/artificial

A side-by-side coding experiment comparing GPT-5.6 Luna and DeepSeek V4 Flash shows that DeepSeek's apparent 5x price advantage shrinks when retries are included. The article argues for more comprehensive benchmarks reporting cost per attempt and cost per verified success.