Agentic Chain-of-Thought Steering for Efficient and Controllable LLM Reasoning
Summary
ACTS (Agentic Chain-of-Thought Steering) formulates LLM reasoning control as a Markov decision process where a controller agent adaptively steers a frozen reasoner during inference using reasoning strategies and steering phrases. The approach achieves comparable accuracy to full-thinking models with significant token savings, enabling controllable accuracy-efficiency trade-offs.
Similar Articles
Adaptive Latent Agentic Reasoning
This paper introduces Adaptive Latent Agentic Reasoning (ALAR), a dual-mode framework for LLM agents that uses compact latent reasoning for routine turns and selectively escalates to explicit chain-of-thought for harder decisions, achieving up to 84.6% token reduction while maintaining task accuracy.
Latent Reward Steering: An Adaptive Inference-Time Framework that Implicitly Promotes Cognitive Behaviors in Reasoning LLMs
Introduces Latent Reward Steering (Lrs), an adaptive inference-time framework that uses sparse autoencoder latent states and a learned reward model to implicitly promote cognitive behaviors like verification and backtracking in reasoning LLMs, improving performance across multiple models and benchmarks.
ACIL: Auto Chain of Thoughts for In-Context Learning
This paper introduces ACIL, an automatic Chain-of-Thought framework to enhance In-Context Learning by generating and pruning reasoning chains, improving LLM performance on complex tasks.
Search for Truth from Reasoning: A Dynamic Representation Editing Framework for Steering LLM Trajectories
This paper investigates the geometry of truth in LLM reasoning chains and proposes DynaSteer, a dynamic representation editing framework that uses pattern clustering and Fisher-LDA to steer trajectories towards truth while avoiding noise. Experiments show effectiveness on MATH benchmarks and generalization to coding tasks.
@rao2z: "When an LLM outputs a step-by-step plan, it creates a powerful illusion that you are watching a machine reason its way…
A position paper by Subbarao Kambhampati and researchers at Arizona State University argues that chain-of-thought reasoning in LLMs creates an illusion of reasoning, and the industry needs to move beyond costly token generation to alternative reasoning mechanisms.